Preheating of Femur Component in Hybrid Total Hip Arthroplasty
NCT00319085 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: PHASE2 · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 80
Last updated 2015-04-10
Summary
Background
* Recently published studies confirm that preheating of femoral component enhances shear strength of implant-cement interface. Both Iesaka et al 2003 and Jafri et al 2004 showed reduction in cement porosity on cement-implant interface with preheated femur components. We will use the radiostereometry analysis (RSA) to investigate how the preheating of femur component influence on prosthesis survivorship. There are no clinical controlled studies performed to the date.
The aim of the study
* Comparison of the migration rates between preheated and non-preheated femur components, analyzed with RSA.
Methods
* Randomization of 80 patients into 2 groups with 40 in each. All patients will undergo standard hybrid total hip replacement. In group one the femur component (Bi-Metric, Interlock Biomet) will be preheated to 40 degrees of Celsius before cementation. In group two: the control group, the femur component will be of room temperature. We will measure the temperature at cement bone interface during the operation with use of thermocouple electrodes inserted through separate drill hole in the femur. The measurements will be recorded every 10 seconds. The patients will follow the standard postoperative rehabilitation program.
* The RSA analysis will be performed the first day after the operation and at 3, 12, 24 months postoperatively.
* The Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry scanning (DEXA) of the femur will be performed at the first week after the operation and at 12 and 24 months postoperatively.
* The patients will be followed both clinically and radiologically at 1 and 2 years after the operation (Harris Hip Score).
* The results will be expressed as mean + SD (in mm). ANOVA statistical analysis will be used to confirm the differences between the groups.
Conditions
- Osteoarthritis, Hip
Interventions
- PROCEDURE
-
Total hip replacement (Preheating of femur stem)
Total hybrid hip arthroplasty, cementation of femural component, preheating, radiostereometry, DEXA
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
Northern Orthopaedic Division, Denmark
lead OTHER
Principal Investigators
-
Mogens B Jørgensen, M.D. · Northern Orthopaedic Division, Aalborg University Hospital, Denmark
-
Mogens B Laursen, M.D., Ph.D · Northern Orthopaedic Division, Aalborg University Hospital, Denmark
-
Lotte Borgwardt, dr. · Frederikberg Hospital, Copenhagen
-
Kjeld Søballe, Ph.D., MD. · University Hospital of Aarhus
-
Poul T Nielsen, M.D. · Northern Orthopaedic Division, Aalborg University Hospital, Denmark
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 70 Years
- Max Age
- 85 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- No
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2006-05-31
- Primary Completion
- 2010-04-30
- Completion
- 2010-04-30
Countries
- Denmark
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
Randomized Controlled Trial of Total Hip Arthroplasty
NCT05093361 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Cementation of Cup and the Risk of Second Revision
NCT06583382 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING
-
Total Hip Arthroplasty (THA) Surgical Techniques Comparing the Direct Anterior Approach to the Posterior Approach
NCT01807104 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
A Comparison of Two Different Surgical Techniques in Hip Resurfacing Arthroplasty
NCT00913679 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
A Trial Comparing Mini-posterior Approach and Direct Anterior Approach
NCT01024309 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparing Total Hip Arthroplasty and Hemi-Arthroplasty on Secondary Procedures and Quality of Life in Adults With Displaced Hip Fractures
NCT00556842 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Prediction of Pain in Total Hip Arthroplasty
NCT01324375 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Comparison of Two Cementing Techniques of the Femoral Component in a Hip Prosthesis
NCT01952067 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Radiographic Changes and Clinical Implications of Implantation of Shortened Uncemented Femoral Stems in THA
NCT05666284 ·Status: UNKNOWN
-
POLARSTEM Retrospective Multicenter Study
NCT02680340 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Evaluation of Metal-on-conventional-polyethylene vs Ceramic-on-ceramic Articulating Surfaces in Total Hip Arthroplasty
NCT03692364 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Total Hip Arthroplasty (THA): Early Load Versus Load Late
NCT01495546 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Uncemented Compared to Cemented Femoral Stems in Total Hip Arthroplasty
NCT02247791 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Ceramic-on-ceramic THA for Post-traumatic Hip Osteoarthritis After Acetabular Fracture
NCT04034043 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Hemi Artificial Hipjoint Versus Total Artificial Hipjoint
NCT01432691 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Bone Mineral Density Changes of the Acetabulum After Revision Hip Arthroplasty Using Bone Impaction Grafting
NCT02061904 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of the Restoration of Hip Biomechanical Parameters by CT Measurement Between the 3 Surgical Techniques: RSA/Minihip/THA - Hip Replacement: 3D Planning
NCT06272422 ·Status: RECRUITING
-
Comparative Study of Minimally Invasive Surgical Approaches for Total Hip Arthroplasty
NCT04311125 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Exception Cementless Hip Stem
NCT04349046 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING
-
Femoral BMD Change Following Cemented or Cementless Total Knee Arthroplasty
NCT06733597 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Anterior Capsulectomy vs. Repair in Direct Anterior THA
NCT01621932 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of Stability of Two Uncemented Hip Implants Used for Total Hip Arthroplasty
NCT02656771 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Improvement of Implant Survival in Total Joint Arthroplasty of the Trapeziometacarpal Joint
NCT01554748 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Cementless One-stage Revision of the Chronic Infected Hip Arthroplasty
NCT01015365 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Anterior Minimal Invasive Surgery Versus Antero-lateral Approach in Hip Joint Hemiarthroplasty
NCT05255198 ·Status: COMPLETED