Metal-metal Articulations Versus Standard 28 mm Cementless Total Hip Arthroplasty
NCT01113762 · Status: UNKNOWN · Phase: PHASE2 · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 71
Last updated 2017-12-19
Summary
Younger hip patients often need revision of their hip replacement due to wear and loosening. Newer concepts (resurfacing and large head total hip replacement) with articulation surfaces in metal may reduce the wear, increase the longevity of the implant and give an improved function. The possible downside is that these concepts releases metal debris to the body. The investigators wish to see if the newer interventions are a clinical improvement compared to standard. The investigators also wish to investigate the extent of metal released to the body and any effect on the immune system. Finally the investigators wish to investigate the stability of these new implants and their ability to preserve the bone around the implant.
The investigators hypothesis is:
That the metal on metal articulations will not have better clinical outcomes than standard The resurfacing implant is expected to preserve the bone of the upper femoral bone. The implants are expected to be stabile within the first year.
Conditions
- Osteoarthritis, Hip
Interventions
- DEVICE
-
articular surface replacement ASR, DePuy
posterolateral incision
- DEVICE
-
ReCap/Magnum modular head, Biomet
posterolateral incision
- DEVICE
-
Bimetric stem, mallory/head cup, 28 mm ceramic head, Biomet
posterolateral incision
- DEVICE
-
28 mm CrCo head, Trilogy CH cup, VerSys Fiber stem,Zimmer)
posterolateral incision
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
Ministry of the Interior and Health, Denmark
collaborator OTHER_GOV -
Region Zealand
collaborator OTHER -
Zimmer Biomet
collaborator INDUSTRY -
DePuy Orthopaedics
collaborator INDUSTRY -
University of Southern Denmark
lead OTHER
Principal Investigators
-
Soeren Overgaard, MD, professor, phd · University of Southern Denmark
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Masking
- NONE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 40 Years
- Max Age
- 65 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- No
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2007-02-28
- Primary Completion
- 2009-11-30
- Completion
- 2019-11-30
Countries
- Denmark
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
Evaluation of Metal-on-conventional-polyethylene vs Ceramic-on-ceramic Articulating Surfaces in Total Hip Arthroplasty
NCT03692364 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of Cemented and Cementless Fixation of Dual-mobility Hip Prosthesis in Elderly Patients With Osteoarthritis
NCT02404727 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
A Multicentre Trial to Compare Two Articulating Bearing Surfaces as Used in Cementless Primary Hip Arthroplasty
NCT01247038 ·Status: TERMINATED ·Phase: NA
-
Uncemented Compared to Cemented Femoral Stems in Total Hip Arthroplasty
NCT02247791 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
A Five-Year Metal-on-Metal Retrospective Clinical Study
NCT01481896 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Primary Ceramic-on-Ceramic Total Hip Replacement Versus Metal-on-Metal Hip Resurfacing in Young Active Patients
NCT00285129 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Metal on Metal Versus Metal on Highly Crossed Linked Polyethylene Sytem
NCT01422564 ·Status: TERMINATED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Assessment of Polyethylene Wear, Migration and Clinical Outcome in Total Hip Replacement
NCT02196792 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Short-Term Clinical Outcome of Total Hip Arthroplasty Using Larger Diameter of 4th Generation Ceramic Bearing
NCT01103882 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
A Comparison of Two Different Surgical Techniques in Hip Resurfacing Arthroplasty
NCT00913679 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial of Dual-Mobility Components in Primary THA
NCT03371212 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: PHASE4
-
RSA-Study of Cemented Hip Prostheses With Five Different Articulations
NCT00698672 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Metal on Metal Versus Ceramic on Metal Hip Replacement
NCT00208494 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Long-term Outcomes of Conical Tapered Stems in Cementless Total Hip Arthroplasty Due to Congenital Hip Pathologies
NCT04748458 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Comparison of Two Cementing Techniques of the Femoral Component in a Hip Prosthesis
NCT01952067 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Fitmore Versus CLS Stem in Total Hip Arthroplasty. Bilateral One-stage Operations
NCT03112785 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Ceramic-on-Ceramic Total Hip Arthroplasty and Squeaking: Influence of Component Design
NCT01420900 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparing Collared and Collarless Femoral Stems in Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty
NCT07337642 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Metal on Metal Total Hip Arthroplasty and Metal on Metal Total Hip Resurfacing.
NCT04516239 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Comparison of Wear Between Two Dual-mobility Acetabular Cups in Patients Undergoing Total Hip Arthroplasty
NCT07207005 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Randomized Clinical Trial of Ceramic Bearing Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty
NCT01522014 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Evaluation of Stability of Two Uncemented Hip Implants Used for Total Hip Arthroplasty
NCT02656771 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Fixation of OsseoTi™ Porous Structure Versus PPS (Porous Plasma Spray) Coating on the G7™ Acetabular Component for Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty
NCT02316704 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
A Study to Assess the Long-term Performance of SmartSet® HV and SmartSet® GHV Bone Cements in Primary Total Hip Replacement
NCT00872066 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Primary Uncemented Partly Ti-coated Total Hip Prosthesis With and Without HA, and Alumina-on-alumina Articulation
NCT01118247 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA