MedTrace Logo

A Comparison of Two Different Surgical Techniques for Total Hip Resurfacing

NCT00750984 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 49

Last updated 2018-01-11

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

This study compares the posterior approach to the anterolateral approach using the ReCap® Total Hip Resurfacing System.

Conditions

Interventions

PROCEDURE

Anterolateral approach

The anterolateral approach is performed with the patient positioned on the side. The blood supply to the femoral neck from the medial circumflex artery is regarded preserved by this surgical method.

PROCEDURE

Posterior approach

The posterior approach is performed with the patient positioned on the side. The medial circumflex artery is cut at the lower border of the short external rotators risking a compromised blood supply to the femoral head.

DEVICE

ReCap Total Hip Resurfacing

This arm utilizes the anterolateral approach using the ReCap® Total Hip Resurfacing System.

DEVICE

ReCap Total Hip Resurfacing

This arm utilizes the posterior approach using the ReCap® Total Hip Resurfacing System.

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Aarhus University Hospital

    collaborator OTHER

  • Zimmer Biomet

    lead INDUSTRY

Principal Investigators

  • Thomas Pryno, MD · Aarhus University Hospital

  • Kjeld Soeballe, MD, PhD · Aarhus University Hospital

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
29 Years
Max Age
61 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2008-09-30
Primary Completion
2013-07-31
Completion
2017-02-28

Countries

  • Denmark

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Entities

Diseases

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT00750984 on ClinicalTrials.gov