MedTrace Logo

Comparison Between Automated and Manual Component Impaction in Total Hip Arthroplasty

NCT05480813 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 1

Last updated 2022-07-29

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

This study will investigate and evaluate the ergonomic impaction and the operational efficiency of the KINCISE™ impaction system in comparison with the manual impaction of a handheld traditional mallet in total hip arthroplasty (THA) procedures.

Conditions

  • Total Hip Arthroplasty (THA)

Interventions

DEVICE

Automated KINCISE™ impaction system versus handheld traditional mallet

The KINCISE™ Surgical Automated System (KINCISE) (DePuy Synthes Products, Inc, Warsaw, IN) was developed to replace the handheld mallet traditionally used in total hip arthroplasty (THA). The device is an FDA-approved medical instrument.

OTHER

Efficiency and ergonomics analysis and physical assessments

Operational efficiency, ergonomic impaction, cognitive/physical/stress level evaluations,

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • BeScored Institute

    collaborator UNKNOWN

  • DEO NV

    lead INDUSTRY

Principal Investigators

  • Jeroen Dille · DEO NV

Study Design

Allocation
NA
Purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Masking
NONE
Model
SINGLE_GROUP

Eligibility

Sex
MALE
Healthy Volunteers
Yes

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2022-07-14
Primary Completion
2022-07-19
Completion
2022-07-19

Countries

  • Belgium

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT05480813 on ClinicalTrials.gov