The LAMA Trial: Laparoscopic Correction of Perforated Peptic Ulcer Versus Open Correction

NCT00745667 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 109

Last updated 2008-09-03

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

This is a multicenter trial comparing laparoscopic correction of a perforated peptic ulcer with the open technique by upper laparotomy. Hypothesis is that after laparoscopic correction will be discharged 3 days sooner due to less postoperative pain and complications.

Conditions

  • Perforated Peptic Ulcer

Interventions

PROCEDURE

laparoscopic surgery

laparoscopic correction perforated peptic ulcer

PROCEDURE

Upper laparotomy

upper laparotomy for correction of perforated peptic ulcer

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Gastrostart

    collaborator OTHER
  • Erasme University Hospital

    lead OTHER

Principal Investigators

  • Johan Lange, PhD,MD · Erasmus university hospital

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
18 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
1999-07-31
Primary Completion
2006-12-31
Completion
2007-01-31

Countries

  • Netherlands

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT00745667 on ClinicalTrials.gov