Comparison of Laparoscopic Surgery and Open Surgery for Repair of Gastric Perforation
NCT06870604 · Status: COMPLETED · Type: OBSERVATIONAL · Enrollment: 827
Last updated 2025-03-11
Summary
Gastric perforation (GP) is a penetrating lesion of the gastric wall that accounts for 10-15% of all peptic ulcer perforations, and most GP are spontaneous perforations caused by ulcer disease. Due to the presence of gastric acid, most patients often present to the emergency department with severe abdominal or chest pain due to chemical peritonitis within a few hours of perforation. Emergency physicians often quickly diagnose GP by using a chest x-ray or CT in an upright position and the patient's symptoms. Studies have shown that about 80-85% of patients with GP had subphrenic free gas visible on x-ray in the upright position.
Surgery is currently the mainstay of treatment for most GP, and almost all cases require urgent surgical repair.2 Over the past few years, laparoscopic surgery has become increasingly popular in clinical practice due to its advantages of less pain, less scarring, and early mobility out of bed, and has become the standard treatment for many elective and emergency procedures.
Since the laparoscopic study of PPU was first published by Mouret P in 1990, investigators have launched extensive discussions on the effects of laparoscopic surgery and open surgery in patients with perforated ulcers. However, to our knowledge, there are few separate discussions on GP, and the postoperative prognosis of laparoscopic surgery for patients with GP is less clear. Therefore, the aim of this multicenter, large-scale retrospective study was to compare the clinical outcomes of laparoscopic surgery and open surgery in patients with GP, to investigate whether laparoscopic surgery is safe and feasible for patients with GP, and to provide reliable evidence for surgical strategies in patients with GP.
Conditions
- Gastric Perforation
Interventions
- PROCEDURE
-
do open surgery
Open surgery was performed in patients undergoing gastric perforation
- PROCEDURE
-
do laparoscopic surgery
Laparoscopic surgery was performed in patients undergoing gastric perforation
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
Dong Peng
lead OTHER
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 18 Years
- Max Age
- 95 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- No
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2013-01-01
- Primary Completion
- 2023-12-01
- Completion
- 2024-01-01
More Related Trials
-
Open Versus Laparoscopic Repair of Perforated Peptic Ulcer
NCT06484699 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Application of Laparoscopy in Gastrointestinal Injury
NCT01994148 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Upper Gastrointestinal Perforations: a Nationwide Registry-based Study
NCT06154603 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING
-
Peptic Ulcer Perforation Study
NCT00624169 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
The LAMA Trial: Laparoscopic Correction of Perforated Peptic Ulcer Versus Open Correction
NCT00745667 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Omitting Drains After Repair of Peptic Ulcer Perforations
NCT06084741 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Postoperative Gastroesophageal Reflux Symptoms After Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy Based on the Presence of Preoperative Symptoms
NCT06835933 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING
-
Morbidity After Surgical Treatment of Perforated Ulcer
NCT05489497 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Damage Control Laparotomy
NCT02706041 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
ERAS in Patients With Perforated Peptic Ulcer Disease Who Underwent Laparoscopic Repair
NCT04039646 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Falciformopexy for Treatment Perforated Peptic Ulcer.
NCT05715450 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
The Anti-reflux Effect of Double-flap Technique in Laparoscopic Proximal Gastrectomy.
NCT06511609 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Prevention of Petersen's Hernia After Laparoscopic Gastrectomy
NCT05105360 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Study About no Antimicrobial Prophylaxis in Totally Laparoscopic Distal Gastrectomy
NCT03802097 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Laparoscopy Versus Clinical Follow up to Detect Diaphragm Injury
NCT01044550 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Endoscopic Treatment of Recurrent Upper GI Bleeding: OTSC [Over the Scope Clip] Versus Standard Therapy
NCT01836900 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Laparoscopic Access in General Surgery: the Closed (Veress Needle) Technique Versus the Open (Hasson) Technique
NCT03506555 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Surgeon Perception of Gastric Decompression at Time of Gynecologic Laparoscopy
NCT06137976 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Laparoscopic Versus Open Appendectomy Plus Peritoneal Lavage for Acute Complicated Appendicitis Patients With Diffuse Peritonitis
NCT06633744 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING
-
Role of Minimally Invasive Surgery in Management of Penetrating Abdominal Trauma in Children
NCT04580875 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Laparoscopic Total vs Partial Fundoplication in Patients With Atypical Symptoms of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease
NCT05647668 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Dumping Syndrome and Quality of Life After Vagus Nerve-preserving Distal Gastrectomy
NCT03880747 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Trial for Application of Laparoscopic Total Gastrectomy With Lymph Node Dissection for Gastric Cancer (KLASS-06)
NCT03385018 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Laparoscopic Toupet's Fundoplication: Is it Proper Solution of Radiological Negative, Endoscopically Positive Hiatal Hernia Patients
NCT06884800 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparative Ergonomic Analysis of Robotic Versus Laparoscopic Surgery
NCT01903577 ·Status: TERMINATED ·Phase: NA