Effect of Intraperitoneal Drain Placement on Postoperative Outcomes Following Laparoscopic Appendectomy in Adult Patients With Perforated Appendicitis
NCT06927765 · Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING · Type: OBSERVATIONAL · Enrollment: 500
Last updated 2025-04-15
Summary
Acute appendicitis is the most common acute abdomen, and a small number of patients can progress to perforated appendicitis, which has significantly higher complications than non-perforated appendicitis. Appendectomy is the only option for treating perforated appendicitis. Optimizing the diagnosis and treatment of perforated appendicitis is of great significance to improve its clinical outcomes and save medical resources.
There is a consensus that drainage should not be placed after surgery for non-perforated appendicitis, but the decision to place drainage for perforated appendicitis remains controversial. Several retrospective studies have shown no benefit in postoperative recovery and hospital stay, and may lead to increased infectious complications and longer hospital stays. A small number of prospective studies have shown similar conclusions, but the sample size is too small, most of them are children, and there is a lack of large-scale multicenter studies. The investigators' preliminary retrospective survey suggests that in China, most surgeons still commonly place drains for peace of mind after surgery with perforated appendicitis in adults without seeing a clear benefit, so there is a need for a multicenter prospective randomized controlled study to evaluate the need for drainage placement after perforated appendicitis and to guide clinical practice with evidence.
To study the effect of abdominal drainage on the postoperative clinical outcomes of adult patients with perforated appendicitis, mainly including: infectious complications (residual infection or abscess in the abdominal cavity, incision infection, fecal fistula, etc.), case fatality rate, pain score, length of hospital stay (LOS), quality of life (QOL) score, etc.
Conditions
- Perforated Appendicitis
Interventions
- OTHER
-
No abdominal drain is placed
No abdominal drain is placed
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University
lead OTHER
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 18 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- No
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2024-06-01
- Primary Completion
- 2025-05-31
- Completion
- 2025-05-31
Countries
- China
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
Evaluation the Role of Laparoscopic Management of Perforated Appendicitis
NCT03267082 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
A Trial on Laparoscopic Appendectomy Versus Single Port Appendectomy
NCT01348464 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Early Versus Delayed Operation for Perforated Appendicitis
NCT00414375 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Outcome of Elderly Patients With Appendicitis
NCT04791657 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Laparoscopic Versus Open Appendectomy
NCT04618666 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Trial on Postoperative Outcomes According to the Number of Trocar During Laparoscopic Appendectomy
NCT00816933 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE1
-
Laparoscopic Appendectomy Performed by Junior SUrgeonS: Impact of 3D Visualization on Surgical Outcome
NCT03770897 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Initial Versus Delayed Operation for Treatment of Complicated Appendicitis In Children
NCT00540189 ·Status: TERMINATED ·Phase: NA
-
Transgastric Peritoneoscopy and Appendectomy
NCT00952146 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Outcome After Laparoscopic Surgery for Peptic Ulcer Perforation
NCT05147870 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Explanations for Negative Laparoscopic Appendectomies and Normal Laparoscopies
NCT03349814 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Appendectomy by Low Impact Laparoscopy vs Routine Laparoscopy : a Randomized Prospective Monocentric Trial
NCT04614519 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Postoperative Complications After Appendectomy
NCT03119740 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Laparoscopic Approach in Adhesive Intestinal Obstruction
NCT06799208 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING
-
Outcomes After Laparotomy for Penetrating Abdominal Trauma
NCT04536818 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
The Laparoscopic Appendicitis Score; a Multicenter Validation Study
NCT02029781 ·Status: TERMINATED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Laparoscopic Surgery Versus Open Surgery in the Treatment of Adhesive Small Bowel Obstruction
NCT01867528 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Single Incision Versus Conventional Laparoscopic Appendectomy
NCT01424631 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Laparoscopic Versus Open Appendectomy? Let the Patient Decide
NCT01738750 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Omitting Drains After Repair of Peptic Ulcer Perforations
NCT06084741 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Nomogram for Predicting Difficult Laparoscopic Appendectomy
NCT06818942 ·Status: RECRUITING
-
Application of Laparoscopy in Gastrointestinal Injury
NCT01994148 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Perforated Appendicitis With Delayed Presentation
NCT01068288 ·Status: TERMINATED ·Phase: NA
-
Frequency of Perforated Appendicitis in Times of COVID-19
NCT04472052 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Laparoscopic Versus Open Appendectomy
NCT01967745 ·Status: COMPLETED