Comparison of Laparoscopic Surgery Versus Open Surgery in the Treatment of Adhesive Small Bowel Obstruction
NCT01867528 · Status: UNKNOWN · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 102
Last updated 2018-06-19
Summary
Small bowel obstruction is a common reason for surgical admission. Most common reason for small bowel obstruction is adhesions, which account up to 70-80 % of small bowel obstructions. Large proportion of adhesive small bowel obstructions may be treated nonoperatively, but up to 50-60% may need surgical intervention. Current golden standard for surgical intervention is open adhesiolysis. Recently, retrospective studies have provided encouraging results of laparoscopic adhesiolysis for small bowel obstructions. However, no prospective randomized trials have been carried out and retrospective series carries a high risk for patient selection and bias. Although in general laparoscopy has been associated with shortened hospital stay, less pain and reduced mortality, laparoscopic adhesiolysis for small bowel obstruction has been reported to cause iatrogenic small bowel lesions up to 7% of patients. Aim of the study is to compare open adhesiolysis to laparoscopic adhesiolysis. The investigators hypothesis is that laparoscopic adhesiolysis is safe, will shorten the hospital stay, and reduce mortality compared to open approach.
Conditions
- Adhesive Small Bowel Obstruction
Interventions
- PROCEDURE
-
Laparoscopic adhesiolysis
- PROCEDURE
-
Open adhesiolysis
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
Helsinki University Central Hospital
lead OTHER
Principal Investigators
-
Ville Sallinen, MD, PhD · Helsinki University Central Hospital
-
Panu Mentula, MD, PhD · Helsinki University Central Hospital
-
Ari Leppäniemi, MD, PhD · Helsinki University Central Hospital
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Masking
- NONE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 18 Years
- Max Age
- 95 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- No
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2013-07-31
- Primary Completion
- 2018-05-31
Countries
- Finland
- Italy
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
Appendectomy by Low Impact Laparoscopy vs Routine Laparoscopy : a Randomized Prospective Monocentric Trial
NCT04614519 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Adhesiolysis in Chronic Abdominal Pain
NCT01245023 ·Status: WITHDRAWN ·Phase: NA
-
Prevalence of Port Site Hernia After Mesh Placement in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy.
NCT03495557 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Technical Modifications of Appendicular Stump Closure During Laparoscopic Appendectomy
NCT03750032 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Appendectomy in Children Performed by Residents in the Era of Laparoscopic Surgery
NCT01657565 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Open Versus Laparoscopic Appendectomy
NCT00908804 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Single Incision Laparoscopic Appendectomy in the Community Utilizing Conventional Instruments
NCT00925145 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Effect of Intraperitoneal Drain Placement on Postoperative Outcomes Following Laparoscopic Appendectomy in Adult Patients With Perforated Appendicitis
NCT06927765 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING
-
A Danish Audit of Small Bowel Obstruction
NCT04750811 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING
-
Transumbilical Laparoscopy-assisted Appendectomy
NCT04485247 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Open to Laparoscopic Reverse Conversion of Perforated Appendicitis
NCT05283733 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Benefit of Laparoscopic Adhesiolysis in Patients With Chronische Abdominal Pain
NCT02839564 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Protocol for Patients Above 75 Years Undergoing Emergency Laparotomy
NCT04293653 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Transrectal NOTES Appendectomy - Feasibility Study
NCT01189916 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Preserving or Resecting the Normal Appendix in Patients Undergoing Laparoscopy Surgery for Suspected Appendicitis
NCT06917612 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Transgastric Peritoneoscopy and Appendectomy
NCT00952146 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Single-incision Laparoscopic (SILS) Versus Conventional Laparoscopic Appendectomy for the Treatment of Acute Appendicitis
NCT00997516 ·Status: TERMINATED ·Phase: NA
-
Laparoscopic Versus Open Appendectomy
NCT04618666 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Vacuum Assisted Closure Versus On-demand Relaparotomy in Patients With Fecal or Diffuse Peritonitis
NCT03932461 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation the Role of Laparoscopic Management of Perforated Appendicitis
NCT03267082 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Diagnostic Scoring for Small Bowel Obstruction
NCT03461744 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Laparoscopic Assisted Pull-through Versus Other Surgical Procedures for Treatment of Hirschsprung Disease
NCT03269812 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Natural Orifice Transgastric Endoscopic (NOTES) Transgastric Diagnostic Peritoneoscopy With Laparoscopic Assistance
NCT00962650 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
A Trial on Laparoscopic Appendectomy Versus Single Port Appendectomy
NCT01348464 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Single Incision Versus Conventional Laparoscopic Appendectomy
NCT01515293 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE3