MedTrace Logo

Laparoscopic Versus Open Repair of Peptic Ulcer Perforation

NCT04447170 · Status: UNKNOWN · Type: OBSERVATIONAL · Enrollment: 200

Last updated 2021-12-29

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

Although laparoscopic repair (LR) of perforated peptic ulcers (PPUs) has long been accepted, clinical evidence comparing LR versus open repair (OR) remains lacking. The aim of this study is to evaluate the feasibility, safety and outcome of laparoscopic gastric repair and compare it with the outcome open repair by relying on a propensity score matching statistical technique

Conditions

  • Surgery
  • Emergencies
  • Peptic Ulcer Perforation

Interventions

PROCEDURE

Simple repair or Graham technique

Simple suture with or without omental protective patch

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Gianluca Costa

    lead OTHER

Eligibility

Min Age
18 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2017-01-01
Primary Completion
2021-11-30
Completion
2022-04-01

Countries

  • Italy

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT04447170 on ClinicalTrials.gov