Randomized Controlled Study Comparing Three Different Techniques for Open Hernia Repair

NCT01699971 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 160

Last updated 2012-10-04

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

The primary aim is to evaluate if PSH and/or ultrapro mesch reduces chronic groin pain postoperatively compared to lichtenstein mesh. The second aim is to evaluate quality of life, recovery from surgery and frequency of recurrencies in the three groups

Conditions

  • Inguinal Hernia

Interventions

PROCEDURE

Hernia repair

Hernia repair admodum Lichtenstein with polypropylene mesh

PROCEDURE

Hernia repair

Hernia repair with Ultra Pro Hernia System (UHS)

PROCEDURE

Hernia repair

Hernia repair with Prolene Hernia System(PHS)

Sponsors & Collaborators

Principal Investigators

  • Anders Thorell, Assoc Prof · Karolinska Institutet

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
18 Years
Max Age
75 Years
Sex
MALE
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2006-10-31
Primary Completion
2009-03-31
Completion
2012-03-31

Countries

  • Sweden

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Entities

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT01699971 on ClinicalTrials.gov