Labour Induction With Misoprostol, Dinoprostone and Bard Catheter
NCT00602095 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: PHASE3 · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 592
Last updated 2008-01-28
Summary
This is a randomised study aimed at comparing the currently most frequently used prostaglandin dinoprostone to two other methods, the cheaper and perhaps more effective prostaglandin misoprostol and a transcervical catheter. 592 women were recruited and randomised to one of the three methods. The main outcome measures were time to delivery, rate of instrumental deliveries and maternal neonatal outcome. Our hypothesis was that misoprostol would be superior to the other methods.
The main finding of our trial was that the catheter showed the shortest induction to delivery interval. There were no differences between the two other prostaglandins. No differences in maternal and neonatal outcome was found
Conditions
- Pregnancy
Interventions
- DRUG
-
0.025mg tablet vaginally every 4 hour until progress
- DRUG
-
dinoprostone
2mg vaginal gel every 6 hours until progress
- DEVICE
-
Bard Catheter (balloon catheter)
Intracervical balloon catheter positioned above internal cervical os and filled with sterile water. Removed when cervix was dilated
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
Karolinska University Hospital
lead OTHER
Principal Investigators
-
Lena Marions, MD PhD · Karolinska University Hospital Institute
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Masking
- NONE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 18 Years
- Sex
- FEMALE
- Healthy Volunteers
- No
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2004-12-31
- Primary Completion
- 2007-03-31
- Completion
- 2007-03-31
More Related Trials
-
Randomized Controlled Trial: Induction of Labour of Obese Women With Dinoprostone or Single Balloon Catheter
NCT01962831 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of the Effectiveness, Safety, and Satisfaction of Different Methods for Labor Induction
NCT06794385 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Efficacy of Induction of Labor on Term Using a Double Balloon Catheter Compared to Dinoprostone Vaginal-insert
NCT01720394 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Double Balloon Catheter Versus Dinoprostone Vaginal Insert for Cervical Ripening.
NCT01170819 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Comparing Cervical Foley Catheter, Dinoprostone and a Combination of the Two for Labor Induction
NCT02815865 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Labor Induction After Failed Induction With Dinoprostone.
NCT04597333 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Prostaglandins Versus Trans-cervical Balloon for Induction of Labor in Fetal Growth Restriction (PROBIN)
NCT05674487 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Induction of Labor in Term Pregnancies With Unfavourable Cervix
NCT04280874 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Cook Balloon Versus Propess After 12 Hours of Rupture of Membranes
NCT03310333 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Propess Versus Prostin for Induction of Labour in Women With Term PROM
NCT04743297 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Outpatient Versus Inpatient Balloon Catheter Induction of Labor
NCT02793609 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Labor Induction With Dinoprostone in Oppose to Cervical Ripening Balloon as a Factor of BMI.
NCT03033264 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Concurrent Membrane Sweeping With Dinoprostone Versus Dinoprostone in Labor Induction of Nulliparas at Term With an Unfavorable Cervix
NCT01792375 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Different Medications to Induce Labor
NCT06259097 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: PHASE3
-
Outpatient Transcervical Balloon For Induction of Labor
NCT05798728 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
A Study Comparing Vaginal Misoprostol and Intravenous Oxytocin for Induction of Labor
NCT01634854 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Safety and Efficacy of Dinoprostone (Propess) in the Women With Premature Rupture of Membrane or Gestational Age <38
NCT01916291 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE2
-
Foley Catheter Versus Dinoprostone Vaginal Insert for Induction of Labor in Parous Women at Term: A Randomized Trial
NCT01596296 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Cervical Ripening Before Induction of Labour at Term: a Randomised Comparison of Prostin vs Propess
NCT00545194 ·Status: WITHDRAWN ·Phase: PHASE3
-
A Randomized, Control Trial for Preinduction Cervical Ripening
NCT00393731 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE2
-
Artificial Induction of Labour in Full-term Singleton Pregnancy : Comparative Randomized Trial of Two Strategies
NCT04452747 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
24-Hour Vaginal Dinoprostone Pessary Versus Gel for Labour Induction
NCT00843362 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Is There an Interest in Repeating the Vaginal Administration of Dinoprostone (Propess®), to Promote Induction of Labor of Pregnant Women at Term?
NCT02888041 ·Status: TERMINATED ·Phase: PHASE3
-
Outpatient Labor Induction Using Oral Misoprostol in Norway
NCT04746248 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
A Randomized Comparison of Transcervical Foley Bulb With Vaginal Misoprostol to Vaginal Misoprostol Alone for Induction of Labor
NCT02566005 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA