MedTrace Logo

Concurrent Membrane Sweeping With Dinoprostone Versus Dinoprostone in Labor Induction of Nulliparas at Term With an Unfavorable Cervix

NCT01792375 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 192

Last updated 2020-03-04

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

To compare concurrent membrane sweeping with dinoprostone versus dinoprostone in labor induction for nulliparas at term with an unfavorable cervix

Conditions

  • Nulliparous Women Who Scheduled for Labor Induction

Interventions

PROCEDURE

Concurrent membrane sweeping with Dinoprostone

Women assigned to "Sweep" had their cervix swept by inserting the examining finger as high as possible past the internal cervical os, immediately followed by the placement of a 10mg Dinoprostone vaginal insert in the posterior fornix.

DRUG

10mg Dinoprostone vaginal insert

For women assigned to "No sweep": The only 10mg Dinoprostone vaginal insert were placed in the posterior fornix for cervical ripening

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Seoul National University Hospital

    lead OTHER

Principal Investigators

  • Kyo Hoon Park, MD, PhD · Seoul National University Bundang Hospital

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Sex
FEMALE
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2013-02-28
Primary Completion
2018-02-28
Completion
2018-02-28

Countries

  • South Korea

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT01792375 on ClinicalTrials.gov