MedTrace Logo

Foley Catheter Versus Dinoprostone Vaginal Insert for Induction of Labor in Parous Women at Term: A Randomized Trial

NCT01596296 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 154

Last updated 2020-03-03

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

The purpose of this study is to assess the effectiveness and safety of transcervical foley catheter as compared to dinoprostone vaginal insertion for preinduction cervical ripening and labor induction in term parous women with unfavorable cervix.

Conditions

  • Failed Induction of Labor

Interventions

DEVICE

Transcervical foley catheter

16 French foley catheter insertion

DRUG

Dinoprostone 10mg

Dinoprostone vaginal insertion

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Seoul National University Hospital

    lead OTHER

Principal Investigators

  • Kyo Hoon Park, MD, PhD · Seoul National University Bundang Hospital

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Sex
FEMALE
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2012-05-31
Primary Completion
2017-10-31
Completion
2017-10-31

Countries

  • South Korea

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT01596296 on ClinicalTrials.gov