The Balloon Project for Birth Induction
NCT01255839 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: PHASE4 · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 825
Last updated 2010-12-08
Summary
The use of prostaglandin E2 (PGE2) for induction of labour in women with unfavourable cervices is well-established1. There are, however, potential side effects to prostaglandins, in particular the risk of uterine hypertonicity which may affect fetal outcome. In theory a mechanical ripening based on dilatation of the cervix as well as induction of production of endogenous prostaglandin has potentially less influence on the fetal outcome but a Cochrane review from 2001 scrutinized studies on mechanical ripening versus placebo/no treatment or prostaglandin E2. They conclude there is insufficient data to evaluate the effectiveness in terms of likelihood of vaginal delivery in 24 hours, and emphasise the need for large sample size studies and substantive outcomes. Two later randomised studies compared mechanical ripening to PGE2 and found discrepant results regarding time from induction to delivery.
The primary purpose of the present study was in a randomized design to compare the efficacy of double-balloon catheter versus vaginal PGE2 (minprostin 3 mg) on induction of labour, duration of birth and fetal outcome. Secondary analyses were to evaluate the results for various subgroups, i.e. primipara/multipara, gemelli, vaginal birth after caesarean, preterm birth and intra uterine growth restriction.
Conditions
- Induction Time
- Apgar Score
- Admission to Neonatal Unit
- Vaginal Delivery
- Caesarean Section
Interventions
- DEVICE
-
Double Balloon
The Double Balloon Catheter was applied (Atad 5) with 80 ml NaCl installed intrauterine above the intern orificium and 80 ml below in cervix/vagina.
- DRUG
-
Minprostin
The prostaglandin 2 minprostin (3mg) was applied vaginally
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
Glostrup University Hospital, Copenhagen
lead OTHER
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- SUPPORTIVE_CARE
- Masking
- NONE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Sex
- FEMALE
- Healthy Volunteers
- No
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2002-12-31
- Primary Completion
- 2005-09-30
- Completion
- 2010-12-31
Countries
- Denmark
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
Labour Induction With Misoprostol, Dinoprostone and Bard Catheter
NCT00602095 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE3
-
Labor Induction With Dinoprostone in Oppose to Cervical Ripening Balloon as a Factor of BMI.
NCT03033264 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Balloon Catheter Versus Propess for Labour Induction
NCT03199820 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Comparison of Pre-Induction Cervical Ripening
NCT01390233 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Induction of Labor in Term Pregnancies With Unfavourable Cervix
NCT04280874 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Artificial Induction of Labour in Full-term Singleton Pregnancy : Comparative Randomized Trial of Two Strategies
NCT04452747 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Double Balloon Catheter Versus Dinoprostone Vaginal Insert for Cervical Ripening.
NCT01170819 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
DOuble-BAlloon Versus PROstaglandin E2 for Cervical Ripening in Low Risk Pregnancies
NCT04747301 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Two Rhythm of Administration of Prostaglandin Gel for Induction of Labor
NCT04413890 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE2
-
Cervical Ripening for Induction of Labor: Misoprostol Versus Oxytocin in Conjunction With Foley Balloon
NCT01139801 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Mode of Induction in Fetal Growth Restriction and Its Affects on Fetal and Maternal Outcomes
NCT03625518 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: EARLY_PHASE1
-
Combined Foley Catheter Balloon and PGE2 Vaginal Ovule for Induction of Labor at Term: A Randomized Study
NCT02861079 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE2
-
Cervical Ripening Before Induction of Labour at Term: a Randomised Comparison of Prostin vs Propess
NCT00545194 ·Status: WITHDRAWN ·Phase: PHASE3
-
Cervical Ripening Balloon in Induction of Labour at Term
NCT02620215 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Stepwise Labor Induction Following Failure of Prostaglandin Vaginal Insert for Labor Induction
NCT02684305 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE3
-
Induction of Labor in Oligohydramnios
NCT00815542 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE3
-
Balloon + Oxytocin Versus Oral Misoprostol to Induce Labor in Case of PROM (RUBAPRO2)
NCT05568745 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Outpatient Versus Inpatient Balloon Catheter Induction of Labor
NCT02793609 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Mechanical cervicAl ripeninG for Women With PrOlongedPregnancies
NCT02907060 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE3
-
Randomized Controlled Trial: Induction of Labour of Obese Women With Dinoprostone or Single Balloon Catheter
NCT01962831 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Outpatient Transcervical Balloon For Induction of Labor
NCT05798728 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Prostin and Propess in Induction of Labor
NCT01635439 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE3
-
A Trial of Prostaglandin E2 Tablets Versus Foley Catheter for Labor Induction
NCT02486679 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Induction to Labour With Double Cervical Ballon at Home Versus at Hospital
NCT06053073 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
24-Hour Vaginal Dinoprostone Pessary Versus Gel for Labour Induction
NCT00843362 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE4