Renogram Study With Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy (PERC): Alterations in Renal Blood Flow as a Consequence of PERC
NCT00169741 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 4
Last updated 2016-02-23
Summary
Patients with large or otherwise complex renal calculi are commonly treated by percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PNL; PERC). PERC requires the creation of an approximately 10 mm channel through the renal parenchyma, into the intra-renal collecting system, in order to effect stone fragmentation and extraction. Although the nephrostomy tract is confined to a small fraction of the renal parenchyma (approximately 1%), the trauma associated with the creation of the tract will affect blood flow and oxygen delivery to regions beyond the immediate site of injury. It is possible that this could result in a significant functional renal impairment. There are several reports describing the effect of PERC on renal function, but interpretation of these studies is difficult, due to a lack of uniformity in patient selection and variability in the timing of peri-operative evaluation. Recent data from the investigators' lab, obtained from a porcine model, suggest that, acutely, PERC causes a significant decrease in renal function as measured by para amino hippurate (PAH) clearance. The purpose of this study is to determine, in a rigorous and standardized fashion, the acute effects of PERC on renal function, as measured by nuclear renography.
Conditions
- Renal Calculi
Interventions
- OTHER
-
Renogram
Subjects who enroll in this study will undergo a nuclear scan called a renogram to assess renal function prior to surgery (baseline), approximately one hour after surgery (to assess percutaneous effects on renal function) and finally approximately 6 weeks post-operatively (to assess return to baseline).
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
Indiana Kidney Stone Institute
lead OTHER
Principal Investigators
-
James E Lingeman, MD · IU Health Physicians Urology
Study Design
- Allocation
- NA
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Masking
- NONE
- Model
- SINGLE_GROUP
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 18 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- No
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2005-05-31
- Primary Completion
- 2016-02-29
- Completion
- 2016-02-29
Countries
- United States
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
Comparing Previously Placed Nephrostomy Tract (NT) Versus Single Stage Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy (PCNL)
NCT00907946 ·Status: TERMINATED ·Phase: NA
-
"Dusting" Versus "Basketing" - Treatment Of Intrarenal Stones
NCT01619735 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Evaluation of Pain Before and After Removal of Non-obstructive Kidney Stones
NCT03657667 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Use of the PercSys MicroStent Device to Alleviate Ureteral Stone Symptoms and Hydronephrosis
NCT01637519 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy for Treatment of Kidney Stones Greater Than 2 cm
NCT03189264 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Trial of Efficacy of the RetroPerc Device
NCT05022537 ·Status: WITHDRAWN ·Phase: NA
-
Tubeless Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy Without Reverse Insertion of a Ureteral Catheter
NCT05574517 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Escalating, Constant and Reduction Energy Output in SWL for Renal Stones
NCT02037906 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
The Effect of Three Endourological Procedures for the Management of Renal Calculi Regarding Acute Kidney Injury
NCT03112499 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Retrograde Ureteral Catheterization Is Not Essential in Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy: A Randomized Controlled Trial
NCT06750913 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Intraoperative Assessment of of Burst Wave Lithotripsy (BWL)
NCT03873259 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Effect of Double J Stent on Outcomes of Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy
NCT03636516 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Mini-PNL, RIRS, and ESWL for Treatment of Medium-Sized, High-Density, Non-Lower Pole, Renal Stones
NCT04856722 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Multitract Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy(PCNL) in Large Renal Stones.
NCT05291702 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
The Influence of SMP on Renal Pelvic Pressure In Vivo
NCT02760134 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Laparoscopic Pyelolithotomy Versus Percutaneous Nephrolothotomy for Management of >3cm Renal Pelvis Stone
NCT01637337 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE2/PHASE3
-
Ureteral Stenting After Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery for Renal Stones
NCT05738304 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Standard vs Mini-PCNL for the Treatment of Stone Disease
NCT04069013 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Ultra Mini Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy VS Stented Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy for Stone Management
NCT05697341 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Postoperative Outcomes of PCNL vs RIRS in Obese Patients With Pelvic 1.5:3 cm Renal Stones
NCT06175910 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
The Impact of Ureteral Stents on Peristalsis
NCT01739738 ·Status: WITHDRAWN
-
A Pilot Study Assessing The Feasibility Of Outpatient Tubeless Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy (PCNL)
NCT01437904 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
MIP Versus PCNL for Kidney Stone Disease
NCT04767919 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Mini-PNCL vs fURS in Management of Nephrolithiasis
NCT04389853 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Management of Medium Sized Renal Stones
NCT06720311 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA