"Dusting" Versus "Basketing" - Treatment Of Intrarenal Stones
NCT01619735 · Status: COMPLETED · Type: OBSERVATIONAL · Enrollment: 178
Last updated 2018-09-18
Summary
The purpose of this study is to evaluate outcomes of an established procedure for treatment of kidney stones that are present within the inner aspect of the kidney. This procedure is called flexible ureteroscopy, which involves placing a small camera through the urethra while anesthetized (asleep), up the ureter (the tube connecting kidney and bladder) and into the kidney to the kidney stone. Then, the stone is broken into tiny fragments using a small laser called a Holmium laser. While this treatment is a well-established option for treatment of these stones, there are several different techniques used to help eliminate them from the kidney. Some urologists treat the stone by a method called "active" extraction whereby the ureteroscope is passed back and forth into the kidney to remove all visible stone fragments. Others use a method called "dusting" whereby the stones are broken into tiny fragments or "dust" with the intention that achieving such a small stone size will allow the stones to pass spontaneously. There has not been a systematic and rigorous comparison of these techniques in terms of treatment outcomes. By collecting information on the success of treatment, the investigators hope to provide benchmark data for future studies of kidney stone treatment and improve the care of all patients who need surgery for their kidney stones.
The investigators hypothesize that the stone free rate for renal stone(s) 5-15 mm is around 90% and that the stone clearance rate with be 20% higher in those patients that undergo complete stone fragment extraction versus those that undergo stone dusting (residual fragments \< 2mm).
Conditions
- Kidney Calculi
- Kidney Stones
- Nephrolithiasis
- Renal Stones
Sponsors & Collaborators
- lead OTHER
Principal Investigators
-
Mitchell Humphreys, MD · Mayo Clinic
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 18 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- No
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2013-04-30
- Primary Completion
- 2017-03-22
- Completion
- 2017-06-10
Countries
- United States
- Canada
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
Laser Lithotripsy for Ureteral Stones
NCT06465784 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Utilizing Holmium Laser for FURS Renal Stone Lithotripsy Comparing Stone Breaking vs. Stone Dusting Settings
NCT02683993 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Management of Lower Pole Renal Hard Stones ≤2 cm
NCT06120257 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Massage Percussion for Passage of Urolithiasis Fragments After Ureteroscopy.
NCT05872230 ·Status: TERMINATED ·Phase: NA
-
Study of the Benefits of a Short Spa Treatment on the Elimination of Residual Lithic Fragments After Treatment
NCT04031911 ·Status: TERMINATED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of the Efficacy of Flexible Ureteroscope and Percutaneous Nephroscopic Surgery in the Treatment of 2-4cm Kidney Stones
NCT06507176 ·Status: TERMINATED ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of Pain Before and After Removal of Non-obstructive Kidney Stones
NCT03657667 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
ESWL Vs Flexible Uretroscopy in Management of Upper Ureteric Stones a Prospective Randomized Study
NCT06722703 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Flexible Ureteroscopy Versus Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy
NCT07193940 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Comparing Super Pulse Fiber Thulium Laser and Holmium Laser for Ureteral Stone Fragmentation During Ureteroscopy
NCT06667557 ·Status: RECRUITING
-
Ho:YAG Laser Versus Thulium Laser for the Management of 2-4cm Kidney Stones During SMP
NCT05190536 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Effectiveness of LASER in Treatment of Ureteric Stones.
NCT06975488 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Long Pulse Versus Short Pulse Laser Dusting for Renal Stones
NCT03608098 ·Status: WITHDRAWN ·Phase: NA
-
Extracorporal Shockwave Lithotripsy Versus Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery for the Treatment of Kidney Stones
NCT01514032 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Ureteral Stent Placement After Ureteroscopy for Renal Stones: A Randomized Controlled Trial
NCT03855787 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison Between Ureterorenoscopy With Lithotripsy Alone Versus Combination With Hydrogel for Kidney Stone Removal
NCT06469736 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Efficacy of Semi-rigid Ureteroscopic Laser Lithotripsy in the Treatment of Proximal Ureteral Stones: a Randomized Controlled Trial
NCT06489366 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Ureteroscopy Combined With Negative Pressure Sheath Treatment of Kidney Stones
NCT06938113 ·Status: ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION
-
Flexible Ureteroscopy Versus ESWL in the Management of Lower Calyceal Stones
NCT02658942 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Treatment of Upper Urinary Tract Stones With a Diameter≤2cm by Intelligent Pressure-controlled Flexible Ureteroscope
NCT05201599 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Extracorporeal Shockwave Lithotripsy, Electroconductive and Electrohydraulic Types
NCT06144372 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of High and Low Pulse Energy Dusting Protocols Using Holmium: YAG-laser in Flexible Ureteroscopy for Renal Stones Treatment
NCT06338137 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy: A Registry and Database
NCT00159393 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Effectiveness of Holmium and Thulium Lasers With Ureteroscopy for Urinary Lithiasis
NCT04871984 ·Status: UNKNOWN
-
Trial Assessing Renal Damage During Ureteroscopy
NCT05350423 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA