Mesh Repair of Anterior Vaginal Wall Prolapse
NCT00420225 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: PHASE3 · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 202
Last updated 2007-01-11
Summary
The purpose of this study is to determine whether reenforcement with polypropylen mesh compared with traditional anterior colporrhaphy for anterior vaginal wall prolapse results in fewer recurrences.
Conditions
- Anterior Vaginal Wall Prolapse
Interventions
- DEVICE
-
Low-weight prolypropylene mesh
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
Tampere University
lead OTHER
Principal Investigators
-
Kari Nieminen · Tampere University Hospital, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Masking
- NONE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 50 Years
- Sex
- FEMALE
- Healthy Volunteers
- No
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2003-04-30
- Completion
- 2008-05-31
Countries
- Finland
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
Performance of Tension Free Vaginal Mesh (Prolift) Versus Conventional Vaginal Prolapse Surgery in Recurrent Prolapse.
NCT00372190 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparative Study of Mesh Versus No Mesh in Prolapse Surgery
NCT00153257 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Polypropylene Mesh in Prolapse Surgery
NCT02383199 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Safety Study of Pelvic Organ Prolapse Repair Using Transvaginal Mesh
NCT00402844 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE2/PHASE3
-
A Randomised, Controlled Study of Bimesh, Pelvicol for Vaginal Wall Prolapse
NCT00442247 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Vaginal Native Tissues Repair for Pelvic Organ Prolapse
NCT03875989 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison Between Transvaginal Mesh and Traditional Surgery for Pelvic Organ Prolapse
NCT00566917 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Biological Mesh Versus Synthetic Mesh in Interdisciplinary RRP With SCP
NCT06245577 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Native Tissue Repair in Pelvic Organ Prolapse -Long-term Results and Risk of Re-operation
NCT06744972 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Restorelle® Mesh Versus Native Tissue Repair for Prolapse
NCT02162615 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Anterior Colporrhaphy Versus Cystocele Repair Using Polypropylene Mesh or Porcine Dermis
NCT01393171 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Surgical Treatment To Greater Anterior Vaginal Prolapse
NCT00676325 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Anterior Vaginal Wall Reconstruction
NCT00571350 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE1/PHASE2
-
Clinical Assessment of the Total Vaginal Mesh Technique for Treatment of Genital Prolapse
NCT00196495 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
The ELEGANT Trial: Elevate Transvaginal Mesh vs. Anterior Colporrhaphy
NCT01497171 ·Status: TERMINATED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Smartmesh Technology in Pelvic Floor Repair Procedures
NCT03098641 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Avaulta Versus Anterior Repair
NCT00627549 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Two Vaginal Mesh Kits in the Management of Vaginal Prolapse
NCT03187574 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
National,Multicentric Randomised Study of the Correction of Genital Prolapse With Fascial Repair or Mesh-Prolift
NCT00771225 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Comparison of Single Versus Multicenter Outcomes for Pelvic Organ Prolapse Repair Using a Mesh-capturing Device
NCT03077490 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Prospective Randomized Study to Compare Results of Pelvic Organ Prolapse Repair With One Versus Two Vaginal Meshes
NCT02536001 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
The Use of Avaulta for Anterior Repair
NCT00918099 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Sacrocolpopexy Versus Vaginal Mesh Procedure for Pelvic Prolapse
NCT01097200 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Restorelle® Y Mesh vs. Vertessa® Lite Y Mesh for Laparoscopic and Robotic-assisted Laparoscopic Sacrocolpopexy
NCT03681223 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Trial of Collagen Mesh for Prevention of Ventral Hernia After Surgery for Advanced Pelvic Cancer
NCT00647569 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE3