Misoprostol Versus Dinoprostone in Induction of Labor
NCT06909721 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 200
Last updated 2025-04-03
Summary
Endogenous prostaglandins, derived from the uterus, cervix, placenta, and membranes of fetus, are essential for cervical ripening ,the investigators aimed to compare Misoprostol and Dinoprostone as regarding to cost-effectiveness and safety in induction of Labor.
Both misoprostol and dinoprostone have demonstrated efficiently in cervical ripening and labor induction. However, their use must be carefully monitored to minimize risks and optimize outcomes. Factors such as parity, gestational age, maternal medical history, and the indication for induction should be considered when selecting the most appropriate induction method. Additionally, patient preferences and institutional protocols play a role in decision-making.
Recent advancements in IOL techniques include the use of combination methods, like mechanical and pharmacological agents, to enhance efficacy and reduce complications. For example, the combination of a Foley catheter with low-dose misoprostol has been shown to improve cervical ripening and reduce the time to delivery . Additionally, the development of new pharmacological agents, such as misoprostol vaginal inserts and controlled-release dinoprostone gels, offers promising alternatives for safe and effective labor induction.
Conditions
- Induction of Labor
Interventions
- DRUG
-
to compare Misoprostol and Dinoprostone as regarding to cost-effectiveness and safety in induction of normal Labor
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
Al-Azhar University
lead OTHER
Principal Investigators
-
Mahmoud Ebrahim Al Rashidi, Professor · Obstetrics and Gynecology Department, Faculty of medicine,Al-Azhar University, Assiut.
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Masking
- NONE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 20 Years
- Max Age
- 40 Years
- Sex
- FEMALE
- Healthy Volunteers
- No
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2023-06-10
- Primary Completion
- 2024-06-01
- Completion
- 2024-06-10
Countries
- Egypt
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
Low-dose Vaginal Misoprostol Versus Vaginal Dinoprostone Insert for Induction of Labor
NCT03744364 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Efficacy and Safety of Oral Misoprostol 25 μg vs. Vaginal Dinoprostone in Induction of Labor at Term
NCT04955847 ·Status: UNKNOWN
-
Oral and Vaginal Misoprostol for Induction of Labor in Nulliparous Pregnant Women
NCT05696574 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Efficacy and Safety of Hourly Titrated Misoprostol Versus Vaginal Dinoprostone and Misoprostol for Cervical Ripening and Labor Induction
NCT02902653 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Intravaginal Isosorbide Mononitrate in Addition to Misoprostol Versus Misoprostol Only for Induction of Labor
NCT03523754 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE1/PHASE2
-
Misoprostol for Treatment of Postpartum Haemorrhage (PPH) in Home Births
NCT01508429 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Effect of Misoprostol in Reducing Post Partum Hemorrhage After Labor Induction by Oxytocin
NCT02983591 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Using Isosorbide Mononitrate in Reducing Time in Induction of Labor in Post Date Women
NCT03854383 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE2
-
Misoprosotol and Isosorbide Mononitrate for Induction of Second Trimester Abortion
NCT03407521 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Efficacy and Safety of Titrated Oral Misoprostol Solution for Labor Induction at Term
NCT01070472 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Misoprostol for Preventing Postpartum Hemorrhage
NCT00124540 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
A Comparison of Oral Misoprostol and Vaginal Misoprostol for Cervical Ripening and Induction of Labor
NCT02777190 ·Status: TERMINATED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Oral Misoprostol Solution in Comparison to Vaginal Misoprostol in Induction of Labor
NCT03863392 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Misoprostol for Treatment of Postpartum Hemorrhage at Community-level Births in Egypt
NCT01619072 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Misoprostol for Labour Induction
NCT02904317 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Oral Misoprostol Solution in Labor Induction
NCT03927807 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE2
-
Cervical Preparation in Hysteroscopy
NCT03675802 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Misoprostol and Prostaglandin E2 (PGE2) Gel for Induction of Labour in Premature Rupture of Membranes at Term
NCT00355303 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Mifepristone and Misoprostol Versus Misoprostol Alone for Mid-trimester Termination of Pregnancy (14-21 Weeks LMP)
NCT00957346 ·Status: TERMINATED ·Phase: PHASE3
-
Misoprostol Versus Active Management of Labour in CS
NCT03390010 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE1
-
Misoprostol Before Elective Caesarean Section for Decreasing the Neonatal Respiratory Morbidity
NCT03031353 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Is More Than One Dose of Misoprostol Needed to Expedite Vaginal Delivery in a Patient With an Unripe Cervix?
NCT02680314 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE2
-
Safety and Efficacy Study of Vaginal Misoprostol for Cervical Ripening and Induction of Labor
NCT01428037 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE3
-
Outpatient Cervical Ripening With Orally Administered Misoprostol in Diabetics
NCT00514618 ·Status: TERMINATED ·Phase: NA
-
Isosorbide Mononitrate in Induction of Labour
NCT04482881 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: EARLY_PHASE1