Bone Remodeling Around HA-coated Acetabular Cups.
NCT00159497 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: PHASE4 · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 100
Last updated 2014-03-31
Summary
This study was designed to investigate the influence of HA-coating on bone remodeling around the cup in cementless THA.
100 patients gave informed consent to participate in a controlled randomized study between porous coated Trilogy® versus Trilogy Calcicoat®. The cup was inserted in press-fit fixation. The femoral component was a cementless porous coated titanium alloy stem (Bi-Metric®), with a modular 28 mm CrCo head. Effect parameters were Harris Hip Score (HHS) and Bone Mineral Density (BMD) determined by DEXA scanning.
Measurements revealed no difference between the two groups after 3 years, neither in clinical outcome nor in terms of periprosthetic bone density. Patients with Body Mass Index above normal regained more bone mineral than patients with normal weight. This finding supports the assumption that load is beneficial to bone remodeling. Advantages of better sealing of the bone-prosthesis interface, preventing polyethylene induced osteolysis, may still be anticipated for the 7 or 12 year follow-up examinations
Conditions
- Coxarthrosis
Interventions
- DEVICE
-
porous coated Trilogy®
THA
- DEVICE
-
Trilogy Calcicoat®
THA
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
Northern Orthopaedic Division, Denmark
lead OTHER
Principal Investigators
-
Mogens B Laursen, MD · Northern Orthopaedic Division
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 18 Years
- Max Age
- 80 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- No
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 1998-10-31
- Primary Completion
- 2011-01-31
- Completion
- 2011-01-31
Countries
- Denmark
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
Evaluation of Stability of Two Uncemented Hip Implants Used for Total Hip Arthroplasty
NCT02656771 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
The Effect of Implant Coating (BoneMaster) on Migration and Clinical Outcome in Hip Arthroplasty With the Exceed Cup
NCT02311179 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
A Comparison of Two Surface Materials (Tantalum Versus Titanium Fiber Mesh) of Acetabular Components in Hip Arthroplasty
NCT00116051 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of Cemented and Cementless Fixation of Dual-mobility Hip Prosthesis in Elderly Patients With Osteoarthritis
NCT02404727 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Investigating Proximal Migration in Trabecular Metal Cups Used In Acetabular Revision Surgery
NCT02237482 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Bone Remodeling Around a Trabecular Titanium Cup in Total Hip Arthroplasty
NCT06287021 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
A Comparison of Two Total Hip Replacements: Hip Resurfacing System Versus Mallory-Head/Exeter
NCT00116948 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Cemented Acetabular Cups Clinical Study
NCT04831918 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Migration in Total Hip Arthroplasty with a Cemented BiMobile Cup: Better Stability with More Cement?
NCT04049279 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
A Five-Year Metal-on-Metal Retrospective Clinical Study
NCT01481896 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Metal-metal Articulations Versus Standard 28 mm Cementless Total Hip Arthroplasty
NCT01113762 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE2
-
A Comparison of Fixation Method in Total Knee Arthroplasty - Low Viscosity Versus High Viscosity Bone Cement
NCT00175162 ·Status: WITHDRAWN ·Phase: NA
-
Primary Uncemented Partly Ti-coated Total Hip Prosthesis With and Without HA, and Alumina-on-alumina Articulation
NCT01118247 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
RCT Comparing the DEXA Results of the HA-Omnifit Versus the Symax Uncemented Hip Stem
NCT01695213 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Cementless One-stage Revision of the Chronic Infected Hip Arthroplasty
NCT01015365 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Study Comparing BoneMaster Hydroxyapatite Coating With Plasma-sprayed Hydroxyapatite Coating on Acetabular Cups
NCT00859976 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Uncemented Compared to Cemented Femoral Stems in Total Hip Arthroplasty
NCT02247791 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Investigation Comparing Two Different Ultra-porous Coated Surfaces of Uncemented Cups
NCT05773261 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Two Cementing Techniques of the Femoral Component in a Hip Prosthesis
NCT01952067 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Total Hip Arthoplastry Revision by Dual-mobility Acetabular Cup Cemented in a Metal Reinforcement
NCT03680443 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
A Migration and Bone Density Study Comparing Hi-Fatigue Bone Cement and Palacos Bone Cement
NCT01289834 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Dual Mobility Acetabular Cups in Revision TJA
NCT04090359 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Safety of Non-delayed Weight Bearing After Total Hip Replacement With Non-Cemented Fiber Metal Taper Stem
NCT00179088 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Polarstem Versus Corail; a Comparison of Micromotion and Periprosthetic Bone Remodelling of Two Femoral Stems
NCT05815953 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
A Comparison of Two Metal Surface Finishes on Femoral Components in Hip Arthroplasty
NCT00116038 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA