6.3Fr Versus 7.5Fr Mini-Flexible Ureteroscopy for Renal Stones (MINI-FURS)
NCT07798336 · Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 308
Last updated 2026-09-01
Summary
This prospective, randomized, single-blinded, non-inferiority clinical trial will compare the clinical outcomes and cost-effectiveness of two mini-flexible ureteroscopes (6.3Fr and 7.5Fr) used during flexible ureteroscopy for the treatment of renal stones. Adult patients with renal stones up to 15 mm who are scheduled to undergo flexible ureteroscopy will be randomly assigned to one of the two study groups. The primary objectives are to compare stone-free rates and the ability to achieve primary renal access without preoperative ureteral stenting. Secondary outcomes include operative time, fluoroscopy use, ureteral trauma, postoperative stenting, pain, complications, emergency department visits, need for additional procedures, hospital stay, and cost-effectiveness. The results of this study are expected to provide high-quality evidence to guide the selection of mini-flexible ureteroscopes and improve the quality, safety, and value of surgical care for patients with kidney stones.
Conditions
- Kidney Stones
- Nephrolithiasis
- Renal Calculi
Interventions
- DEVICE
-
6.3Fr Mini-Flexible Ureteroscope
Use of a disposable 6.3Fr mini-flexible ureteroscope during flexible ureteroscopy for renal stone treatment
- DEVICE
-
7.5Fr Mini-Flexible Ureteroscope
Use of a disposable 7.5Fr mini-flexible ureteroscope during flexible ureteroscopy for renal stone treatment
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
Sault Area Hospital
lead OTHER
Principal Investigators
-
Yasser A Noureldin, MD, PhD · Urologist, Sault Area Hospital, Sault Ste. Marie, ON, Canada, and Assistant Professor of Urology, Northern Ontario School of Medicine University, ON, Canada
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 18 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- No
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2026-10-01
- Primary Completion
- 2028-02-29
- Completion
- 2028-08-31
Countries
- Canada
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
Comparing Different Diameter fURSs With Similar RESDs for the Treatment of Upper Urinary Tract Stones
NCT06987760 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
FANS-FURS vs Suction Mini-PCNL for 2-3 cm Renal Stones: A Multicenter Randomized Trial
NCT07295860 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Super-Mini Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy Versus Flexible Ureteroscopy for Renal Stones ≤20 mm: A Randomized Controlled Trial
NCT07371494 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Optimal Drainage After Flexible Ureterorenoscopy; Prospective Assessment of Perioperative Outcomes and Health-Related Quality of Life Through a Randomized Controlled Trial
NCT04643145 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Flexible Ureteroscopy Versus Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy
NCT07193940 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Flexible vs Semi-rigid URS
NCT07247617 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Predicting the Success of Flexible Ureterorenoscopy for Kidney and Upper Ureter Stones
NCT07753096 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING
-
Efficacy of Different Modalities on Management of Renal Hard Stones
NCT07445646 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Minimally Invasive Techniques for Treating Large Proximal Ureteral Stones
NCT06199518 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
UPURS Trial for Patient-centered Management of Symptomatic Obstructing Stones
NCT05715086 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Ultra-Mini Versus Standard Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy For Management Of Renal Calculi. A Randomized Controlled Trial.
NCT04764071 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE3
-
Comparing Efficiency and Stone-Free Rates Mini PCNL vs Flex URS
NCT07072598 ·Status: WITHDRAWN ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison Between Different Types of Flexible Ureteroscopes
NCT07360353 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Comparing Treatment of Urolithiasis Between Disposable and Reusable Ureteroscope
NCT03040466 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Flexible Ureteroscopy With a Flexible and Navigable Suction Ureteral Access Sheath Versus Mini-Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy for 1-2 cm Lower Pole Kidney Stones
NCT07159035 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Treatment of Upper Ureteric Stones
NCT02469766 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Surgical Outcomes and Costs in Using the Shenzhen HugeMed 6.3 French Flexible Ureteroscope
NCT07296835 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of Two Different Treatments for Lower Pore Renal Stone: Microperc Vs FURS
NCT03307096 ·Status: WITHDRAWN ·Phase: NA
-
Primary Ureteroscopy for Acute Obstructive Nephropathy Due to Ureteral Stones: A Prospective Non-randomized Feasibility and Safety Trial
NCT07177313 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Are the Stone Density and Location Useful Parameters for Small Kidney Stones?
NCT03503539 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Management of Medium Sized Renal Stones
NCT06720311 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Semi-rigid Ureteroscopy Versus Flexible Ureteroscopy For the Treatment of Proximal Ureteric Stone
NCT04851171 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Management of Lower Pole Renal Hard Stones ≤2 cm
NCT06120257 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
F-URS and Mini PCNL for Pediatric Urolithiasis
NCT06571617 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Two Types of Single-use Flexible Ureteroscopies for the Treatment of Upper Urinary Tract Stones in Children
NCT06628765 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA