Active Engagement Game Versus Passive Media During Pediatric Inhalational Induction
NCT07787351 · Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 128
Last updated 2026-08-31
Summary
The goal of this clinical trial is to learn whether an active, breath-controlled iPad/phone game can reduce the need for physical restraint during mask-based anesthesia induction in children undergoing surgery.
The main question it aims to answer is:
Does an active-engagement game reduce the need for physical restraint during mask induction, compared with standard passive media distraction (such as watching cartoons)?
Investigators will compare children who use the new interactive game to children who receive standard passive audiovisual distraction, to see if the active game lowers rates of physical restraint during induction.
Participants will:
Play an interactive game on an iPad or phone while awake, before anesthesia begins, controlling it themselves.
Continue "playing" once the anesthesia mask is placed over their face, at which point the anesthesiologist takes over the controls using a phone remote.
Have the game synced to their own natural breathing pattern, so the visuals on the screen move in time with each breath, giving them a sense of active control without needing to physically touch the device.
Be compared to a group of children who instead watch passive video content (cartoons or similar) during induction, following standard care.
Conditions
- Pediatric Inhalational Induction
Interventions
- OTHER
-
Balloon game
Interactive balloon game
- OTHER
-
Control
Passive media
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
Hong Kong Children's Hospital
lead OTHER
Principal Investigators
-
Jasmin YM Tong, FHKCA, FHKAM, FRCPC · Hong Kong Children's Hospital
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- OTHER
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 3 Years
- Max Age
- 8 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- Yes
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2026-09-01
- Primary Completion
- 2026-12-31
- Completion
- 2027-02-28
Countries
- China
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
Airtraq Versus Conventional Laryngoscopy in Children
NCT01212536 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
A Comparison of the I-gel and the Self-pressurised Air-Q Intubating Laryngeal Airway in Children
NCT02140008 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
"Cuffed Versus Uncuffed Tracheal Tubes in Small Children"
NCT00221377 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Intubation on a Paediatric Manikin by Emergency Staff: a Comparison of Airtraq and Glidescope
NCT02478203 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Airtraq Versus Standard Direct Laryngoscopy in the Pediatric Airway
NCT00874016 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Pediatric Airway: Noninferiority Trial of Devices for Intubation Assessment
NCT07351227 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
POM vs HFNC for Hypoxemia Prevention in Children
NCT07234188 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Intubating Laryngeal Mask vs Direct Laryngoscopy: a Crossover Randomized Controlled Preterm Manikin Trial
NCT06263790 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Re-evaluation of Blind Intubation Through the Air-Q Intubating Laryngeal Airway
NCT03778762 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Study Aim to Compare the Effect of Different Technique of Airway Managment During Anaesthesia on the Haemodynamics and Intraocular Pressure. Patients Were Divided Into Three Groups of 25 Patients Each. (Group A); Patients Who Were Subjected to LMA Insertion (Group B ).
NCT07504315 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Comparing Between Air-Q Intubating Laryngeal Airway and Ambu® AuraGain™
NCT03130413 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
I-Gel vs Ambu Laryngeal Mask Airways in Infants and Children Undergoing Surgical Procedures
NCT02938039 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Pediatric Endotracheal Intubation During Resuscitation
NCT02286297 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Intubation of a Pediatric Manikin in Difficult Airway by Novice Personnel: A Comparison of Glidescope and Airtraq
NCT02290249 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Comparative Evaluation of Ambu AuraGain, LarySeal Pro and I-gel in Pediatric Airway Management for Day-Case Surgery Under Controlled Ventilation
NCT07274280 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Fiberoptic Intubation With Fiberoptic Intubation Through an Air-Q Intubating Laryngeal Airway in Infants and Small Children
NCT01876940 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Blind Intubation Through The Self-Pressurised Disposable Air-Q Laryngeal Intubation Mask: An International Multicentre Trial
NCT01906060 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Rotation Technique for the Insertion of the ProSeal Laryngeal Mask Airway in Pediatric Patients
NCT01076725 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Application of I-gel Laryngeal Mask Airway in Pediatric Patients
NCT03748589 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Procedural Oxygen Mask vs Nasal Cannula in Pediatric Endoscopy
NCT07234175 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Ambu AuraGain Laryngeal Mask Airway and I-gel in Children
NCT03118245 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Two Airway Devices (I-Gel and Air-Q) in Children Aged 1-10 Years During General Anesthesia
NCT07522957 ·Status: RECRUITING
-
Orotracheal Intubation Using Flexible Fibro Bronchoscope With vs Without Supraglottic Device
NCT04356547 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Fiberoptic Evaluation of i-Gel and Air-Q sp3G Supraglottic Airway Devices in Pediatric Patients
NCT07141498 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Evaluation of the Pediatric Igel Airway in 250 Children
NCT00969189 ·Status: TERMINATED