Effect of Theravex Tissue Care on Implant Stability
NCT07707388 · Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 30
Last updated 2026-07-16
Summary
The aim of this randomized clinical trial is to evaluate the clinical and radiographic outcomes of using Bone Bioactive Liquid (Theravex) compared to Xenograft and a combination therapy (Theravex + Xenograft) during immediate implant placement in the esthetic zone.
When a tooth is extracted and replaced immediately with a dental implant, bone grafting is often necessary to fill the gap (jumping distance) between the implant and the surrounding bone socket to support tissue healing and maintain facial contour.
Participants requiring immediate implant placement will be randomly assigned into three groups:
Group 1: Immediate implant placement using Bone Bioactive Liquid (Theravex).
Group 2: Immediate implant placement using Xenograft alone.
Group 3: Immediate implant placement using Combination Therapy (Theravex + Xenograft).
The primary outcomes will evaluate implant stability, bone dimensional changes, and soft tissue response around the implants over the follow-up period.
Conditions
- Immediate Dental Implant Placement
Interventions
- DEVICE
-
Bone Bioactive Liquid
A bone bioactive liquid (Theravex) applied directly into the jumping gap and on implant surface immediately following implant placement to stimulate early bone healing and osseointegration.
- DEVICE
-
Bovine-derived Xenograft
Bovine derived- xenograft will be packed into the jumping gap to maintain volume and provide an osteoconductive scaffold for bone formation.
- PROCEDURE
-
Immediate Implant Placement
Surgical placement of the dental implant into the fresh extraction socket immediately following tooth extraction, according to standard surgical protocols.
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
Ain Shams University
lead OTHER
Principal Investigators
-
Hadir F Eldessouky · Faculty of Dentistry - Ain Shams University
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- Yes
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2026-11-12
- Primary Completion
- 2027-06-30
- Completion
- 2027-09-08
Countries
- Egypt
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
Assessment of Labial Plate Thickness After Immediate Implant Placement Using Two Different Xenografts in the Esthetic Zone
NCT07449806 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Immediate Implant With no Graft , Autogenous Graft or Xenograft.
NCT03851224 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of Hyaluronic Acid in Addition to Xenograft in Immediate Implant Placement Within Maxillary Esthetic Zone
NCT06783517 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical and Radiographic Evaluation of Delayed Dental Implant Placement After Socket Preservation Using Injectable Bone Graft
NCT07373600 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Immediate Implants in Maxillary Premolar Region Using Xenograft vs Allograft
NCT03716323 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Immediate Implant Placement in the Esthetic Zone With and Without Using Autogenous Mixed With Xenograft
NCT04096209 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Impact of Hyaluronic Acid and Bone Graft on Peri-Implant Tissue
NCT07665281 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Grafting of the Peri-implant Bony Defects Around Immediate Implants Using Xenogenic Versus Alloplastic Sticky Grafts: Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial
NCT06653868 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Implant Placement in Mandibular Molar Xenograft Versus PRF
NCT03177356 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Buccal Bone Resorption in Immediate Implants in Thin and Thick Buccal Plates of Bone in Esthetic Zone
NCT04630665 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Assessment Of Guided Bone Regeneration Using Xenograft Mixed With Allogenic Bone Graft Versus Xenograft Mixed With Autogenous Graft For Augmentation Of Maxillary Alveolar Ridges
NCT07367464 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Buccal Bone Resorption in Immediate SLActive Implant Placement Thin vs. Thick Buccal Bone
NCT04731545 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Socket Preservation Using Biodentin Versus Xeno Graft for Single Rooted Teeth
NCT06695208 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Assessment of Bone Volume Changes in Immediate Implant Placement Using Allograft Versus Xenograft in Mandibular Molars
NCT06962878 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Validity of Ozonated Olive Oil Gel Versus Injectable Bone Graft
NCT07368114 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE2
-
The Effectiveness of Hyaluronic Acid in Bone Regeneration
NCT07031895 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Buccal Plate Augmentation Using Sticky Bone With Simultaneous Immediate Implant Placement
NCT06642753 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical and Radiographic Evaluation of Natural Bovine Bone With Hyaluronic Acid on Osseointegration of Immediate Implant.
NCT07199725 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE2/PHASE3
-
Hyaluronic Acid Effect on Xenogenic Bone Healing
NCT04377256 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Injectable Platelets Rich Fibrin Versus Hyaluronic Acid for Alveolar Ridge Preservation
NCT05781529 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Treatment of Peri-implant Bone Dehiscence Using Autogenous Tooth Plate
NCT06313216 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Soft Tissue Esthetic With Autogenous Dentin Chips and Immediate Implantation Versus Conventional Immediate Implantation With Xenograft in Thin Buccal Bone
NCT03544580 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical and Radiographic Assessment of the Outcomes of Dental Implant Inserted After Xenograft Socket Preservation in Posterior Maxilla
NCT07001813 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Immediate Implant Placement Using Xenograft Mixed with Vitamin D Versus Hyaluronic Acid.
NCT06842368 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Guided Bone Regeneration Using a Mixture of Autogenous and Xenograft Particulate Versus Patient-Specific Sticky Bone for Horizontal Anterior Maxillary Defect
NCT07113886 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA