Comparison of Different Chest Compression Techniques in Infant Resuscitation
NCT07698340 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 116
Last updated 2026-07-13
Summary
In this prospective, single-center, randomized, self-controlled crossover manikin simulation study, participitants performed 2 minutes of single-rescuer CPR (30:2 compression-to-ventilation ratio) with each of the four techniques (the two-finger (2F), three-finger (3F), heel-of-one-hand (HOH), and two-thumb (2T) techniques) in a randomized order, with at least 10 minutes of rest between techniques. Chest compression depth, rate, release velocity, and the proportion of compressions within the target range were recorded using a feedback device. Provider fatigue and perceived difficulty (modified Borg scale) were assessed as secondary outcomes
Conditions
- Resuscitation
- Cardiac Arrest (CA)
Interventions
- PROCEDURE
-
Two-Finger (2F) Technique
Participants perform single-rescuer basic life support CPR on an infant manikin for 2 minutes using the two-finger chest compression technique with a 30:2 compression-to-ventilation ratio
- PROCEDURE
-
Three-Finger (3F) Technique
Participants perform single-rescuer basic life support CPR on an infant manikin for 2 minutes using the three-finger chest compression technique with a 30:2 compression-to-ventilation ratio.
- PROCEDURE
-
Heel-of-One-Hand (HOH) Technique
Participants perform single-rescuer basic life support CPR on an infant manikin for 2 minutes using the heel-of-one-hand chest compression technique with a 30:2 compression-to-ventilation ratio.
- PROCEDURE
-
Two-Thumb (2T) Technique
Participants perform single-rescuer basic life support CPR on an infant manikin for 2 minutes using the two-thumb chest compression technique with a 30:2 compression-to-ventilation ratio.
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
Ankara City Hospital Bilkent
lead OTHER
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- OTHER
- Masking
- NONE
- Model
- CROSSOVER
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 18 Years
- Max Age
- 65 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- Yes
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2024-01-01
- Primary Completion
- 2025-01-01
- Completion
- 2025-01-01
Countries
- Turkey (Türkiye)
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
Pediatric Resuscitation With Feedback Devices
NCT02294721 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Chest Compressions Performed With the Lower Limb and the Classical Method (Lower_limb_CPR).
NCT07646496 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Mechanical Versus Manual Chest Compression
NCT04069377 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Combining Performance of Call EMS and Simultaneous Chest Compressions in a Lone Rescuer CPR
NCT02646046 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Optimum Hand Position During Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation
NCT02715180 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Manual and Mechanical Chest Compression During In-hospital Witnessed Cardiac Arrests Using Cerebral Oximetry
NCT03238287 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Mechanical Versus Manual Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation
NCT04422938 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
The Haemodynamic Effects of Mechanical Standard and Active Chest Compression-decompression During Out-of-hospital CPR
NCT02479152 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Adjusting CPR Location With TEE Guidance
NCT07017075 ·Status: ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION ·Phase: NA
-
Compression Feedback for Patients With In-hospital Cardiac Arrest
NCT02845011 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Assessment of Validity of Depth by PocketCPR as Sites of Smartphone on Arm
NCT02158715 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Evaluating Different Pediatric Emergency Rulers in a Manikin Study - How Fast and Correct Are They
NCT03650296 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Compression Only-CPR Versus Standard-CPR
NCT02401633 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Therapeutic Hypothermia to Improve Survival After Cardiac Arrest in Pediatric Patients-THAPCA-OH [Out of Hospital] Trial
NCT00878644 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE3
-
Compression Is Life In Cardiac Arrest - Quality Study (CILICA-QS)
NCT03140202 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Bystander Fatigue and CPR Quality Using Continuous Compressions Versus 30:2 Compressions to Ventilation
NCT01397656 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Standard CPR Versus Chest Compressions Only
NCT04569812 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Effect of AED-optimized Telephone-assisted CPR Instructions on No-flow Time and Chest Compression Fraction
NCT07520877 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Comparing Therapeutic Hypothermia Using External and Internal Cooling for Post-Cardiac Arrest Patients
NCT00827957 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Visual Feedback of CPR: Does Point of View Matter?
NCT02231151 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Effectiveness of Chest Compressions With Standard vs Feedback-Assisted CPR
NCT07029724 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Pulse Control Using USG and Manual Palpation Methods in Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation
NCT05557032 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Heated Humidification System Breathing Circuit for Maintenance of Body Temperature in Pediatric Patients
NCT03896867 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Assessment of Chest Compression Depth Obtained Using the Smartphone Application as an Educational Tool With New Attachment Device
NCT02964832 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Flowchart-Assisted Resuscitation. Standard CPR vs. Chest Compressions Only: What Happened to the Quality?
NCT02438527 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA