MedTrace Logo

Mechanical Versus Manual Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation

NCT04422938 · Status: COMPLETED · Type: OBSERVATIONAL · Enrollment: 303

Last updated 2020-06-09

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

In this study, the investigators compared mechanical and manual chest compressions in in-hospital cardiac arrest cases.

Conditions

  • Cardiac Arrest
  • Resuscitation

Interventions

OTHER

Manuel chest compressions handled by clinicians

Compressions will be handled by human efforts

DEVICE

LUCAS™ 2 Chest Compression System

LUCAS-2 model piston-based mechanical chest compression device was used for mechanical chest compressions

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Ankara Training and Research Hospital

    collaborator OTHER

  • Ankara City Hospital Bilkent

    lead OTHER

Eligibility

Min Age
18 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2016-01-01
Primary Completion
2017-12-31
Completion
2018-03-31
FDA Device
Yes

Countries

  • Turkey (Türkiye)

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT04422938 on ClinicalTrials.gov