Mechanical Versus Manual Chest Compression

NCT04069377 · Status: COMPLETED · Type: OBSERVATIONAL · Enrollment: 214

Last updated 2019-08-28

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

In this study, the investigators compared mechanical and manual chest compressions in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest cases.

Conditions

  • Cardiac Arrest
  • Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation

Interventions

DEVICE

LUCAS™ 2 Chest Compression System

LUCAS is a portable device designed to rule out the problems encountered during manual chest compression, capable of performing standard and continuous chest compressions at a depth of 4-5 cm and at least 100 times per minute.

OTHER

Manuel chest compressions by human efforts

In this way chest compressions will be handled by humans themselves.

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Ankara Training and Research Hospital

    collaborator OTHER
  • Ankara City Hospital Bilkent

    lead OTHER

Eligibility

Min Age
18 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2016-01-01
Primary Completion
2018-01-15
Completion
2018-04-15
FDA Device
Yes

Countries

  • Turkey (Türkiye)

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT04069377 on ClinicalTrials.gov