MedTrace Logo

Effectiveness of Pediatric Resuscitation

NCT02283034 · Status: UNKNOWN · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 120

Last updated 2014-11-05

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

The aim of this study was to compare five CPR feedback devices to standard BLS in terms of the quality of single rescuer pediatric resuscitation. Therefore, the investigators hypothesis was that there would be no difference between CPR methods in terms of chest compression quality parameters.

Conditions

  • Cardiac Arrest

Interventions

DEVICE

The CPRmeter

Feedback device - 1

DEVICE

The PocketCPR

Feedback device - 2

DEVICE

Standard BLS

Standard basic life support = chest compressions without any feedback device (manual resuscitation)

DEVICE

The CPREazy

Feedback device - 3

DEVICE

The CPR PRO APP

Feedback device - 4

DEVICE

The CardioPump

Feedback devices - 5

DEVICE

Standard BLS

Chest compressions without CPR feedback device (manual resuscitation)

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • International Institute of Rescue Research and Education

    lead OTHER

Principal Investigators

  • Andrzej Kurowski · Institute of Cardiology

  • Lukasz Szarpak · Institute of Cardiology

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE
Model
CROSSOVER

Eligibility

Min Age
18 Years
Max Age
65 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
Yes

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2014-10-31
Primary Completion
2014-11-30
Completion
2014-11-30

Countries

  • Poland

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT02283034 on ClinicalTrials.gov