Custom-Made PEEK Versus PTFE Membranes in Maxillary Alveolar Ridge Augmentation
NCT07679451 · Status: RECRUITING · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 30
Last updated 2026-07-01
Summary
This randomized controlled clinical study aims to evaluate and compare the effectiveness of custom-made polyether ether ketone (PEEK) membranes versus polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) membranes in guided bone regeneration for maxillary alveolar ridge augmentation in the esthetic zone. Thirty patients requiring ridge augmentation prior to dental implant placement will be enrolled and randomly allocated into two equal groups. Group A will receive customized PEEK membranes, while Group B will be treated with PTFE membranes. Clinical and radiographic assessments, including cone beam computed tomography (CBCT), will be performed immediately postoperatively, at 6 months, and at 12 months to evaluate volumetric, horizontal, and vertical bone gain as well as soft tissue healing and complication rates.
Conditions
- Alveolar Ridge Deficiency
Interventions
- DEVICE
-
Custom-made PEEK Membrane
Customized perforated polyether ether ketone (PEEK) membrane designed from preoperative CBCT data and used for guided bone regeneration during maxillary alveolar ridge augmentation.
- DEVICE
-
PTFE Membrane
Polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) membrane used for guided bone regeneration during maxillary alveolar ridge augmentation.
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
Mansoura University
lead OTHER
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 20 Years
- Max Age
- 45 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- No
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2026-01-01
- Primary Completion
- 2027-01-01
- Completion
- 2027-02-01
Countries
- Egypt
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
Demineralized Whole-tooth vs Demineralized Particulate Dentin Grafts in Alveolar Ridge Preservation
NCT05336149 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Extended Platelet Rich Fibrin Versus Allograft as Space Filling Material
NCT07445776 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Alveolar Ridge Augmentation Using Minimally Invasive Subperiosteal Tunneling With Xenogenic Bone Graft and PRF
NCT07079917 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Effectiveness of ALB-PRF With Two Types of Bone Grafts With Putty Form Around Immediate Dental Implants.
NCT06643468 ·Status: ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION ·Phase: NA
-
Guided Bone Regeneration Using Ti-Reinforced PTFE Membrane Vs. Khoury's Technique in Augmentation of Posterior Mandibular Defects
NCT07394933 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Khoury Technique Versus Titanium Reinforced PTFE Membrane in 3D Alveolar Bone Augmentation
NCT06209905 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Assessment Of Guided Bone Regeneration Using Xenograft Mixed With Allogenic Bone Graft Versus Xenograft Mixed With Autogenous Graft For Augmentation Of Maxillary Alveolar Ridges
NCT07367464 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Horizontal Ridge Augmentation Using Polyvinylidene Fluoride Versus Titanium Mesh Membranes
NCT07095530 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Ridge Augmentation Using Patient Specific PEEK Sheets vs. Autogenous Bone Shell Technique.
NCT03607006 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Effect of PEEK and Co-Cr Framework Reinforcement on Marginal Bone Loss Around Implants Supporting a Fixed All-on-four Prosthesis in Completely Edentulous Mandibles. A Randomized Controlled Clinial Trial
NCT06591611 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Effect of PEEK and Titanium Framework Reinforcement on Marginal Bone Loss Around Implants Supporting a Fixed All-on-four Prosthesis in Completely Edentulous Mandibles
NCT07475507 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Patient Centered Outcomes and Marginal Bone Changes in CAD/CAM Metallic and (PEEK) Partial Denture Frameworks
NCT05622448 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Autogenous Bone Block Versus Extended Platelet Rich Fibrin Block for Horizontal Augmentation of Maxillary Ridge With Simultaneous Implant Placement
NCT07424573 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of Peri-Implant Tissues of Different Implant Assisted Overdentures
NCT06647199 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Assessment of Efficacy of Prebent Titanium Mesh Versus Customized Poly-ether Ether Ketone Mesh for Three Dimensional Augmentation in Deficient Maxillary Ridge. a Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial.
NCT07040124 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Management of Severely Atrophied Maxillary Ridge Using Quad Zygomatic Implants
NCT06031506 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Injectable Platelets Rich Fibrin Versus Hyaluronic Acid for Alveolar Ridge Preservation
NCT05781529 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Extended Platelet Rich Fibrin in Mandibular Alveolar Ridge Splitting
NCT06637982 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Guided Bone Regeneration Using a Mixture of Autogenous and Xenograft Particulate Versus Patient-Specific Sticky Bone for Horizontal Anterior Maxillary Defect
NCT07113886 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Two Types of PRF Membranes in Management of Dehiscence Defect in Posterior Mandible
NCT07164417 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Autogenous Demineralized Dentin Block Graft Versus Particulate Deproteinized Bovine Bone Graft for Alveolar Ridge Preservation
NCT05374083 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Two Years Follow up of Polyetheretherketone (PEEK) Sub-periosteal Implant Retaining Maxillary Fixed Prosthesis
NCT05193110 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
A Randomized Controlled Trial Evaluating Dental Implant Placement in the Anterior Esthetic Zone Using Two Guided Bone Regeneration Techniques: Prefabricated CAD/CAM Zirconia Membrane vs. Contour Augmentation.
NCT06987149 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of Guided Tissue Regeneration With Autogenous Bone Chips and CGF During Implant Placement
NCT07521514 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Custom-Made 3D PEEK for Fixation of Mandibular Angle Fractures.
NCT07156812 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE4