Blended vs Conventional Training for ACLS

NCT07670637 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 95

Last updated 2026-06-26

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

The investigators conducted a stratified randomized controlled trial with an embedded cost-effectiveness analysis at a tertiary hospital in China. Participants were randomized to either traditional instructor-led ACLS training (ILT ACLS) or blended-learning HeartCode ACLS training (HC ACLS). The primary outcome was the overall first-attempt ACLS certification pass rate. A cost-effectiveness analysis was conducted from the institutional perspective using certification pass rate as the effectiveness measure. Costs estimation included program delivery costs and productivity losses associated with participant training time.

Conditions

  • Advanced Cardiovascular Life Support

Interventions

BEHAVIORAL

HeartCode ACLS Blended Learning

A blended-learning ACLS course combining online HeartCode self-paced modules with instructor-facilitated hands-on practice sessions.

BEHAVIORAL

Instructor-Led ACLS Training

A traditional, entirely in-person ACLS course delivered by certified instructors, following standard American Heart Association (AHA) guidelines, without online pre-learning components.

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Tongji University

    collaborator OTHER
  • Shanghai East Hospital of Tongji University

    lead OTHER

Principal Investigators

  • Min Ding, MMED · Department of Post-Graduate Education, Shanghai East Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
OTHER
Masking
NONE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
22 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
Yes

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2024-07-01
Primary Completion
2024-12-31
Completion
2024-12-31

Countries

  • China

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT07670637 on ClinicalTrials.gov