Evaluation of Post-operative Pain After Stabilization of Free Gingival Graft for Keratinized Tissue Augmentation Around Natural Teeth Using Titanium Tacks Versus Standard Suturing Technique.
NCT07655349 · Status: RECRUITING · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 24
Last updated 2026-06-17
Summary
The goal of this clinical trial is to learn whether titanium tacks can be used as an alternative to sutures for stabilization of free gingival grafts (FGG) around natural teeth. It will also evaluate the effect of each stabilization technique on patient comfort and clinical outcomes.
The main questions it aims to answer are:
* Does stabilization of free gingival grafts using titanium tacks reduce post-operative pain compared with conventional suturing?
* Does stabilization of free gingival grafts using titanium tacks affect clinical outcomes such as keratinized tissue width, gingival thickness, graft dimensions, procedure time, plaque accumulation, and interference with daily activities?
Researchers will compare free gingival graft stabilization using titanium tacks with the conventional suturing technique to determine whether titanium tacks provide comparable or improved outcomes.
Participants will:
* Receive a free gingival graft around natural teeth requiring augmentation of keratinized gingival tissue.
* Be assigned to have the graft stabilized either with titanium tacks or with conventional resorbable sutures.
* Attend scheduled follow-up visits for clinical examinations and measurements.
* Report their post-operative pain levels using a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS).
* Complete assessments related to daily life interference during the healing period.
* Undergo evaluation of keratinized tissue width, gingival thickness, graft dimensions, plaque index, and procedure time.
Conditions
- To Clinically Compare Post-operative Pain Between Free Gingival Grafts Stabilization Around Natural Teeth Using Titanium Tacks vs Suturing Technique
Interventions
- PROCEDURE
-
Free gingival grafting (FGG) using titanium tacks for stabilization
According to the graft size, 2 to 5 titanium tacks will be used to stabilize and secure the free gingival graft in place to the periosteum at the recipient bed as needed, through anchoring in inter-septal bone and avoiding teeth roots.
- PROCEDURE
-
Free gingival grafting (FGG) using sutures for stabilization.
Stabilization of the free gingival autograft in place using a 5-0 or 6-0 resorbable Prolene suture using a combination of two interrupted sutures, anchoring the grafted tissue to the base of the anatomical papillae, and a horizontal mattress compression suture anchored to the periosteum apical to the bone dehiscence and suspended around the palatal or lingual cingulum of the tooth with the recession defect, allowing for intimate contact ensuring proper perfusion and consequent revascularization of the graft.
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
Karim Abdelrahim Mohamed Abdelsamad
lead OTHER
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 18 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- No
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2025-03-17
- Primary Completion
- 2027-02-01
- Completion
- 2027-07-01
Countries
- Egypt
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
Non-Submerged De-Epithelialized Free Gingival Graft Versus Conventional Free Gingival Graft
NCT07174752 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of Cyanoacrylate as an Alternative to Sutures in Free Gingival Graft Stabilization
NCT06821984 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Cyanoacrylate Versus Sutures for Free Gingival Graft Stabilization
NCT07359300 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Soft Tissue Augmentation Around Dental Implants Using Connective Tissue Graft, Submerged Tenting Abutment, or Sub-crestal Implant Placement
NCT07714265 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Efficacy of Gingival Grafts During the Implantation Process on the Peri-implant Mucosa
NCT06065254 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Growth Factors in the Treatment of the Multiple Gingival Recessions
NCT05319938 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Soft Tissue Augmentation Around Dental Implant
NCT06238427 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Cyanoacrylate Tissue Adhesives Versus Silk Suture at the Palatal Donor Site of Sub Epithelial Connective Tissue Graft
NCT04780360 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical and Histological Assessment of Free Gingival Graft or Collagen Matrix for Socket Sealing After Bone Grafting
NCT05448040 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of Root Coverage After the Use of Coronally Advanced Flap Either With Advanced Paltelet Rich Fibrin or Subepithilial Connective Tissue Graft in Treatment of Miller Class I and II Gingival Recession.
NCT03695549 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Evaluation of (TCAF) Versus (CAF) Combined With Connective Tissue Graft in the Treatment of Multiple RT2 Gingival Recession Sites
NCT07064603 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
The Effect of Using Two Different Suturing Techniques on Free Gingival Marginal Stability
NCT04219436 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Pontic Site Development With or Without Fixed Partial Denture
NCT07535060 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Impact of Microneedling on the Gingival Tissue Surrounding Implant Supported Fixed Restoration.
NCT07294287 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Influence of Keratinized Tissue Width and Attached Gingiva Width on Root Coverage in Patients With Recession Defects: A Prospective Clinical Study
NCT07576439 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Adding Effect of Cross-linked Hyaluronic Acid to Microneedling After Coronally Advanced Flap in Isolated RT1 Recession
NCT07520539 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: PHASE1/PHASE2
-
Morbidity and Coverage Outcome With Connective Tissue Graft Used With Coronally Advanced Flap and Tunneling Technique
NCT02269748 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Effects of Keratinized Mucosa Augmentation Around Dental Implant With Free Gingival Graft in Different Surgical Timing at Mandibular Posterior Sites
NCT07088172 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Soft Tissue Augmentation Using Deepithelialized Free Gingival Graft Compared to Connective Tissue Graft in Management of Miller Class I and II Gingival Recession.
NCT03213483 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
To Compare Free Gingival Grafts and Connective Tissue Grafts Around Implants With Lack of Keratinized Mucosa
NCT03338686 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Two Techniques for Root Coverage With a Xenogeneic Collagen Matrix
NCT02129504 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Peri-implant Tissue Changes Using Dual Zone Concept with Connective Tissue Graft Versus Concentrated Growth Factor
NCT06728696 ·Status: ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION ·Phase: NA
-
Delayed Short Dental Implants With Immediate Loading
NCT07675772 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Use of a Custom-Made Acrylic Palatal Stent to Minimize Donor Site Morbidity After Suture-Free Epithelialized Gingival Graft Harvesting: A Randomized Clinical Trial
NCT07501754 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of Subepithelial Connective Tissue Graft Versus Acellular Dermal Matrix With Tunnel Technique in Treatment of Multiple Gingival Recessions
NCT02916186 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA