MedTrace Logo

Non-Submerged De-Epithelialized Free Gingival Graft Versus Conventional Free Gingival Graft

NCT07174752 · Status: RECRUITING · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 30

Last updated 2025-09-16

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

The goal of this (study type: RCT) is to learn if the use of the non-submerged de-epithelized FGG will result in better esthetic outcomes in adults. The main questions that it aims to answer are:

* Does this procedure increase the width of keratinized tissue?
* Does this procedure increase the depth of the vestibule? Researchers will compare this technique with the gold standard using the FGG to evaluate which technique provides better esthetics.

Conditions

  • Deficient Keratinized Mucosa

Interventions

PROCEDURE

Non-Submerged De-Epithelialized Free Gingival Graft

The Free gingival graft will be de-epithelialized and fixed at the recipient site in a non-submerged manner to increase the keratinized mucosa

PROCEDURE

Conventional FGG

The Free gingival graft will be fixed at the recipient site to increase the keratinized mucosa

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • October University for Modern Sciences and Arts

    lead OTHER

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
18 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2024-12-29
Primary Completion
2026-07-29
Completion
2026-12-29

Countries

  • Egypt

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT07174752 on ClinicalTrials.gov