Cyanoacrylate Tissue Adhesives Versus Silk Suture at the Palatal Donor Site of Sub Epithelial Connective Tissue Graft

NCT04780360 · Status: UNKNOWN · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 20

Last updated 2021-03-08

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

Subepithelial connective tissue grafts (CTG) are considered the gold standard procedure with proven clinical success when it comes to gingival augmentation aims to to improve periodontal health, which can enhance the long-term prognosis of teeth by obtaining soft tissue coverage of exposed root surfaces and/or augmentation the dimensions of gingival tissue. The procedure require harvesting tissue from a the palate, which increases the complexity of the procedure and patient discomfort. Complications after harvesting a graft would be pain, inflammation, bleeding, flap necrosis and infection in the donor site.

Conditions

  • The Effect of Local Aplication of Cayanoacrylate Tissue Adhesives on Improving the Healing

Interventions

PROCEDURE

Cayanoacrylate tissue adhesives

Cyanoacrylates are a family of strong fast-acting adhesives with industrial, medical, and household uses. They are various esters of cyanoacrylic acid. The acryl groups in the resin rapidly polymerize in the presence of water to form long, strong chains

PROCEDURE

Silk suture

Non Absorbalble suture materiel used to fixed the edges of the incision in place until healing

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Cairo University

    lead OTHER

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Masking
DOUBLE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
18 Years
Max Age
50 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
Yes

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2021-02-01
Primary Completion
2021-12-01
Completion
2021-12-01

Countries

  • Egypt

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT04780360 on ClinicalTrials.gov