Touch-to-Teach Interdental Brush Instruction Versus Conventional Guidance on Gingival Health in Patients With Fixed Dental Prostheses
NCT07636954 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 32
Last updated 2026-06-09
Summary
Why is this study being done? People with dental crowns often develop inflamed gums because bacteria accumulate in the tight spaces between teeth that a regular toothbrush cannot reach. Interdental brushes can clean these spaces, but patients frequently use them incorrectly. This study tested whether a personalised, hands-on instructional method called Touch-to-Teach produces healthier gums compared with standard dental hygiene advice.
Who participated? 40 adults with at least one porcelain-fused-to-metal crown in the molar region with supragingival margins took part at Thumbay University Hospital, Ajman, UAE. Four participants withdrew; 36 completed the three-month study.
What did participants do? All participants received full-mouth scaling and standardised toothbrushing instruction. Group 1 (Touch-to-Teach) additionally received probe-guided, site-specific interdental brush selection and guided in-mouth training, with correctly sized brushes provided for home use. Group 2 (Conventional Instruction) received verbal advice, educational videos, and a model-based demonstration, with brush size selected empirically and no brushes provided for home use. Follow-up visits were conducted at one, two, and three months.
What was measured? A blinded examiner recorded gum inflammation, plaque levels, gum pocket depth, and bleeding at each visit. Both groups completed a questionnaire on brush comfort, perceived efficacy, and satisfaction at one and three months.
What were the key results? The Touch-to-Teach group showed significantly greater reductions in plaque accumulation, gingival inflammation, and probing depth compared with the control group. Both groups showed meaningful reductions in gingival bleeding over time, with no statistically significant difference between groups at three months. Patient-reported outcomes consistently favoured the Touch-to-Teach group. These findings suggest that calibrated, personalised interdental brush instruction may offer advantages for patients with fixed dental prostheses.
Conditions
- Gingivitis
- Periodontal Disease
- Fixed Dental Prosthesis
- Dental Plaque
Interventions
- BEHAVIORAL
-
Touch-to-Teach interdental brush instruction
Individualized interdental brush care delivered using the Curaprox Chairside System (Curaprox AG) through three structured phases: Diagnostic Phase: CPS colorimetric probe with five autoclavable color-coded tips (blue 0.6mm, red 0.7mm, pink 0.8mm, yellow 0.9mm, green 1.1mm) used to measure precise accessibility diameter of each interproximal space. Prescription Phase: Matching color-coded interdental brush selected per space. Brush correctly sized when fitting snugly without wire bending or forceful insertion required. Training Phase: Clinician demonstrated technique on dental model then guided patient through procedure in their own mouth until proficiency in correct insertion angle, gentle manipulation, and removal was achieved at each space. Prescribed brushes provided for daily home use for 3 months.
- BEHAVIORAL
-
Conventional oral hygiene instruction
Standardized oral hygiene guidance comprising: verbal instruction in Modified Bass toothbrushing technique; access to European Federation of Periodontology patient portal animated education videos demonstrating interdental cleaning techniques; and chairside hands-on demonstration of interdental brush insertion and manipulation using dental models with corrections provided as necessary. Brush size selected empirically without calibrated probe system. No personalized brush prescription, no CPS probe measurement, and no in-mouth guided insertion performed.
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
Gulf Medical University
lead OTHER
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 18 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- No
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2024-03-15
- Primary Completion
- 2025-06-15
- Completion
- 2025-06-15
Countries
- United Arab Emirates
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
Periosteal Pedicle Flap Versus Subepithelial Connective Tissue Graft in Management of Gingival Recession
NCT06529640 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Guided Creeping Technique (GCT) in Treating Gingival Recession
NCT05101642 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
The Incidence of Gingival Fissures _ a Crossover Single-blinded Randomized Clinical Trial
NCT01636830 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Pinhole Surgical Technique With And Without Use Of Buttons For Treatment Of Multiple Gingival Recessions: RCT
NCT02632968 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Evaluation of The Periodontal Parameters Following Non-Surgical Periodontal Therapy With and Without Adjunctive Use of Injectable Platelet Rich Fibrin: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial
NCT07090265 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: PHASE3
-
Gingival Margin Stability Following Esthetic Crown Lengthening Utilizing a Double Periodontal Surgical Guide
NCT06397521 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of Gingival Fissures Associated With Soft and Medium Toothbrushes
NCT03367481 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
A Novel Vertical Y-shaped Tunnel Approach Versus Modified Coronally Advanced Tunnel Technique, for The Treatment of Miller Class I Gingival Recession
NCT06453369 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
The Effect of Different Gingival Biotypes on Dimensional Stability of Free Gingival Graft
NCT03616197 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Soft Tissue Augmentation Around Dental Implants Using Connective Tissue Graft, Submerged Tenting Abutment, or Sub-crestal Implant Placement
NCT07714265 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Effect of Free Gingival Grafting on Peri-implant Health
NCT06392256 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of Gain In Clinical Attachment And Bone Levels After Treatment of Patients With Intra-bony Defects By Minimally Invasive Surgical Technique Versus Open Flap Debridement.
NCT03570736 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Interdental Guided Creeping Technique
NCT06264869 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of Plaque Removal Efficacy & Patient Acceptability of Knotted Floss Technique in Type II Gingival Embrasures
NCT03414073 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
The Comparison of the Efficacy of Gingival Unit Graft With Connective Tissue Graft in Root Coverage
NCT04637451 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Two Non-surgical Procedure to Manage Gum Disease Around Implants.
NCT07365722 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of SECTG Vs. Laser-DGG in Management of Gingival Recessions.
NCT04133298 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
The Effect of Bristle Brush, Rubber Cup, and Air Polishing on Tooth Surface Roughness of Scaled Teeth
NCT06857474 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Treatment of Peri-implant Mucositis and Supportive Peri-implant Therapy
NCT06137846 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Effectiveness of Gingival Displacement Using Retraction Cord and Aluminum Chloride Gel
NCT07255976 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Clinical Trial of Two Techniques for Gingival Displacement
NCT01848496 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE1
-
Assessing Effects of a Denture Gel on Gum Abrasions
NCT04913636 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
MINST Versus Conventional Subgingival Instrumentation In RT1 Gingival Recession
NCT06044727 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Coronally Advanced Flap and Semilunar Incision Vestibular Technique for Multiple Gingival Recessions in Maxillary Teeth - A Randomized Controlled Trial
NCT03037320 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Minimally Non Surgical Periodontal Therapy Compared to Traditional Approach
NCT05060601 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA