Comparative Evaluation of Minimally Invasive Nonsurgical Periodontal Therapy Versus Conventional Subgingival Instrumentation

NCT05876455 · Status: UNKNOWN · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 20

Last updated 2023-05-25

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

Background- The use of minimally invasive procedures has recently been advocated for the treatment of periodontitis, to minimize patient discomfort and maximize the healing potential. These techniques usually involve the use of magnification lenses or microscopes and small instruments which reduce the risk of tissue trauma compared with traditional instruments.

Rationale- So far only descriptive data about the clinical effects of such procedure are available and comparative studies that would include other treatment alternatives are lacking. Therefore, the aim of this study is, on split-mouth model, to compare the number of diseased sites (defined by probing depth ˃ 4 mm and bleeding on probing) after conventional subgingival instrumentation and Minimally invasive nonsurgical periodontal therapy (MINST) with the usage of special mini instruments and magnifying loupes.

Objectives- To compare sites that have residual probing depth and require further surgical intervention after undergoing the two treatment modalities.

Methods- In this split mouth randomized controlled trial, Test group will undergo non surgical therapy under magnification and using special mini bladed instruments while the control group will undergo conventional subgingival instrumentation. Reevaluation will be at 6 weeks and 3 months.

Expected outcomes- If both the groups differ in outcomes after therapy, MINST can be used to minimize the number of sites that require surgery and hence will reduce treatment costs and morbidity.

Conditions

  • Periodontitis
  • Subgingival Plaque

Interventions

PROCEDURE

Conventional Subgingival Instrumentation

On the conventional non-surgical periodontal therapy side, a power-driven piezo-electric ultrasonic scaling device with scaling tips will be used the majority of the time to debride subgingival biofilm and calculus, and manual standard Gracey curette instruments (Gracey curettes Hu-Friedy, Chicago, IL, USA) will be used to remove residual deposits from the root surface.

PROCEDURE

minimally invasive non-surgical periodontal therapy

minimally invasive non-surgical periodontal therapy will undergo careful scaling and root planing under magnification (use of 3.5 X magnification loupes) with mini curettes and using an ultrasonic device with specific thin and delicate tips. These instruments will be carefully inserted through the periodontal pocket of the affected tooth to reach the root surface for debridement. Caution will be taken to preserve the stability of soft tissues.

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Postgraduate Institute of Dental Sciences Rohtak

    lead OTHER

Principal Investigators

  • Ritika Arora, MDS · PGIDS,ROHTAK

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
18 Years
Max Age
50 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
Yes

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2023-07-10
Primary Completion
2023-10-10
Completion
2023-11-10

Countries

  • India

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT05876455 on ClinicalTrials.gov