Comparative 3-dimensional Superimposition Analysis of Dentition in Horizontal and Vertical Grower During the Retention Phase -A Prospective Clinical Trial''
NCT07622277 · Status: RECRUITING · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 44
Last updated 2026-06-03
Summary
This study aims to investigate the relationship between facial type and relapse of dentition post-orthodontically during the retention phase. According to the retention theorem "teeth which have been moved through orthodontic treatment tend to naturally return to their original position. It is hypothesized that significant differences will exist in tooth movement patterns between horizontal and vertical growers, with horizontal growers exhibiting more pronounced tooth movement in the vertical plane particularly in the overbite as compared to the vertical growers . Furthermore, it is expected that facial type will influence the stability of orthodontic treatment outcomes, with long-faced individuals showing more relapse of mandibular incisor alignment and crowding. By exploring this relationship, this study aims to provide valuable insights into the factors influencing orthodontic treatment outcomes and stability. With long-faced individuals exhibiting more mandibular backward rotation and short-faced individuals showing forward rotation, which increases the risk of deep bite . Additionally, understanding these factors is crucial for orthodontists to predict and prevent potential relapse, ensuring optimal treatment results and long-term stability. Hence, the present trial will be undertaken to assess the changes and compare If there is any difference in tooth movement in 3-Dimensional superimposition in the dentition in horizontal and vertical growers post orthodontically over a period of retention phase.
Conditions
- Retention
- Relapse
Interventions
- OTHER
-
3 planes of space
To evaluate and compare the changes in dentition in 3 planes of space • Antero-posterior plane (Y-axis) • Vertical plane (Z-axis) • Transverse plane (X-axis)
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
Postgraduate Institute of Dental Sciences Rohtak
lead OTHER
Principal Investigators
-
Dr manisha Kamal kukreja, MDS · PGIDS Rohtak
Study Design
- Allocation
- NON_RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- PREVENTION
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 18 Years
- Max Age
- 45 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- Yes
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2025-02-04
- Primary Completion
- 2026-12-31
- Completion
- 2027-07-31
Countries
- India
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
3D-Printed Vs Thermoformed Retainers: Comparison of Post-Treatment Stability, Changes in Mechanical Properties and Patients' OHRQoL
NCT05968625 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Effect of 3 Week vs 6 Week Orthodontic Appointment Intervals on Teeth Alignment
NCT06032702 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Effect of Orthodontic Treatment on the Stability of Pre-Orthodontic Recession Coverage
NCT03886051 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Effectiveness of Aligners Versus Rapid Maxillary Expansion
NCT04760535 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Stability of Maxillary Anterior Teeth After Two Years of Retention in Adolescents Comparing Two Bonded and a Vacuum-formed Retainer
NCT04616755 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Distalization Using Infrazygomatic Crest Miniscrews and Zygomatic Miniplates: A Randomized Clinical Trial
NCT04191070 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
The Effects of Different Storage Conditions on Removable Retainers
NCT05854953 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Effectiveness, Patient Acceptance, and Cost Estimation of 3D-printed Retainer Compared to Hawley Retainer in Expansion Case: a Randomized Controlled Trial
NCT07659041 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Vacuum-formed Retainer Versus Bonded Retainer to Prevent Relapse After Orthodontic Treatment
NCT03070444 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
RCT for the Effectiveness of 3 Orthodontic Retention Schemes on Post-treatment Stability and Gingival Recession
NCT02742493 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Orthodontic Treatment in Adolescents With Crowding and Displaced Teeth
NCT05664282 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of the Efficiency of Maxillary Canine Retraction Using Aligners Versus Conventional Brackets in Orthodontic Extraction Cases.
NCT04333836 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Occlusal Bite Force Changes After Surgical Correction of the Increased Vertical Dimension
NCT04376645 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Interceptive Maxillary Expansion to Relief Anterior Crowding in the Mixed Dentition
NCT06187337 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
The Effect of Patient Preference on Retention Success
NCT06478771 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Does Double With Regular Monitoring Prevent Undesired Tooth Movement?
NCT05626335 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
3D-Printed vs Conventional Fixed Retainers After Orthodontic Treatment
NCT07730476 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Morphological Changes of Removable Orthodontic Retainers During the Use
NCT06283823 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Comparison of Alignment Efficiency, Arch Dimensional Changes, and Passive Extraction Space Closure Between Self-Ligating and Conventional Brackets
NCT07503314 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of the Clinical Efficacy of the Lingual Brackets and Labial Brackets in the Leveling Phase
NCT04357067 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Modified Vacuum-formed Retainers Versus Hawley Retainer
NCT04237298 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
3D Comparison of Anterior Teeth Retraction and Anchorage Control Between En-masse and Two-step Mechanics
NCT03903575 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Effectiveness of Gold Fixed Retainers Compared to Conventional Stainless Steel Retainers
NCT07280455 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Treatment of Retentive Teeth
NCT05727670 ·Status: ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION ·Phase: NA
-
The Effectiveness of 3 Orthodontic Fixed Retention Schemes on Post-treatment Stability and Gingival Recession
NCT05926934 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA