Luting Cements for Prefabricated Zirconia Crown Retention in Primary Anterior Teeth in Children
NCT07611734 · Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 120
Last updated 2026-05-28
Summary
The goal of this clinical trial is to compare the long-term clinical performance of three different luting cements used to bond prefabricated zirconia crowns (PZCs) on primary front teeth in young children. The trial will determine whether any single cement offers superior retention, gum health, or marginal sealing compared to the others over a 3-year period.
Main Questions:
The study aims to answer the following:
Are conventional glass ionomer cement (GIC), bioactive resin-modified glass ionomer cement (BioCem™), and self-adhesive resin cement (SARC) equivalent in retaining prefabricated zirconia crowns on primary incisors over 36 months? Do these cements differ in their effect on gingival health, plaque accumulation, or marginal discoloration around the cemented crown?
Comparison:
Researchers will compare three parallel groups of children whose primary incisors are restored with identical prefabricated zirconia crowns but cemented with one of the three different luting cements.
Participants will: Receive a clinical and radiographic dental examination at screening. Undergo placement of one or more prefabricated zirconia crowns on primary anterior teeth using their randomly assigned cement. Return to the clinic for blinded follow-up evaluations at 12, 24, and 36 months for assessment of crown retention, gingival health, plaque, and marginal staining.
Conditions
- Dental Caries
- Tooth Injuries
- Primary Tooth Restoration
Interventions
- PROCEDURE
-
Cementation with Fuji IX GP Extra Glass Ionomer Cement
Cementation with Fuji IX GP Extra Glass Ionomer Cement Hand-mixed conventional glass ionomer luting cement applied per manufacturer protocol; crown seated under finger pressure for 3 minutes; excess removed after initial set.
- PROCEDURE
-
Cementation with BioCem™ Universal BioActive Cement
Cementation with BioCem™ Universal BioActive Cement Auto-mixed bioactive resin-modified luting cement applied per manufacturer protocol; brief tack-cure to facilitate excess removal followed by full light-curing for 20 seconds per surface.
- PROCEDURE
-
Cementation with RelyX™ Universal Resin Cement
Cementation with RelyX™ Universal Resin Cement Self-adhesive dual-cure resin luting cement applied per manufacturer protocol; tack-cured for 2-3 seconds for excess removal, followed by full light-curing for 20 seconds per surface.
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
Murad Alrashidi
lead OTHER
Principal Investigators
-
MURAD ALRASHIDI, BDS, MSC · Qassim University
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 2 Years
- Max Age
- 7 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- Yes
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2026-05-31
- Primary Completion
- 2029-06-30
- Completion
- 2029-07-31
Countries
- Saudi Arabia
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
A Clinical Trial of Two Types of Aesthetics Crowns for Primary Molars
NCT06973616 ·Status: ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION ·Phase: NA
-
Preparation Time Of Bioflx Crowns Compared To Zirconia Crowns On Primary Molars
NCT06968767 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Custom-made Versus Prefabricated Zirconia Crowns for Primary Molars.
NCT04620174 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
We Will Assess Zirconia Crown Restoring Endodontically Treated Posterior Teeth With Two Finish Line Designs and Two Occlusal Reduction Schemes
NCT07139613 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
36-Month Clinical Performance of Different Restorative Materials in the Treatment of Root Caries Lesions
NCT03722758 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Wear Resistance Of Bioactive With And Without Etching Vs. Conventional Resin-Based Fissure Sealants
NCT07018141 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Outcomes of Digital vs Prefab Crowns for Pulpotomized Primary Molars
NCT06733909 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Primary Molars Restorations With Encapsulated or Hand-Mixed Glass Ionomer: Clinical Trial
NCT02274142 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparing Stainless Steel Crowns with Prefabricated Resin Crowns in Primary Molar Teeth
NCT06713330 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Performance of Bioactive Restorative Materials
NCT07394751 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Outcomes of Bonded Monolithic Translucent Zirconia Crowns Using Two Different Compositions of Self-adhesive Resin Cements
NCT04875468 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Resin-Cement Type Influence on Cement Remnants in Implant-Supported Restorations
NCT06711237 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparative Evaluation of Gingival Health and Bacterial Adhesion in Bioflx vs. Zirconia Crowns on Primary Molars
NCT06933927 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Performance of Four Restorative Materials in Primary Molars
NCT07504393 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Adhesive Cementation Materials and Techniques in Aesthetic Dentistry
NCT07491809 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Injectable Bioactive Composites vs RMGI for Proximal Cavities in Primary Molars
NCT07561216 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Evaluation of Zirconia Crowns and Anterior Strip Crowns
NCT03184012 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
3D-printed Crowns Versus Zirconia Crowns for Primary Molars
NCT06068244 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Patient Satisfaction ,Marginal Integrity ,Shade Matching and Gingival Health of Zirconia Reinforced Lithium Silicate Bridges Cemented Using Bioactive Cement and Adhesive Resin Cement
NCT03691597 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
New Bioactive Restorative Material vs GIC in Restoration of Proximal Lesions
NCT04365283 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Performance and Acceptance of Bioflx Crowns
NCT06677983 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes of Partial Pulpotomy Procedure in Primary Molars Utilizing Different Capping Materials and Different Restorative Methods
NCT06227390 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Injectable Bioactive Composite vs Hall Technique for Proximal Cavities in Primary Molars
NCT07552129 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Evaluation of Bioactive Resin Composites Versus Caries Control Technique in Management of Class I Carious Cavities in High Caries Risk Patients: a Randomized Clinical Trial
NCT06797843 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
This Study Aims to Clinically Assess and Radiographically Measure the Formed Dentin Bridge Over the Pulp, Utilizing Three-dimensional Imaging Following the Application of a Bioactive Restorative System Versus a Conventional Restorative System After Selective Caries Removal to Soft Dentin Over 2
NCT07171775 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA