Inhalational Versus Intravenous Anesthesia on Postoperative Lung Injury in Septic Patients Undergoing Surgery

NCT07601256 · Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 480

Last updated 2026-05-22

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

This randomized controlled trial will compare the effects of intraoperative inhalational anesthesia versus intravenous anesthesia on postoperative lung injury in septic patients undergoing surgery. The primary goal is to determine if the choice of anesthetic technique influences the incidence or severity of this complication. Participants will be randomly assigned to one of the two anesthetic regimens during surgery. They will receive daily in-hospital assessments for lung injury and other outcomes and will be followed for clinical outcomes until 90 days after the procedure.

Conditions

Interventions

DRUG

Inhalation Anesthesia

The inhalation group will be maintained with inhaled sevoflurane and a continuous intravenous infusion of remifentanil.

DRUG

intravenous anesthesia

The intravenous group will be maintained with continuous intravenous infusions of both ciprofol and remifentanil.

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University

    lead OTHER

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
QUADRUPLE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
18 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2026-08-15
Primary Completion
2030-12-30
Completion
2030-12-30

Countries

  • China

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Entities

Diseases

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT07601256 on ClinicalTrials.gov