Effects of Different Tunnel Methods in PICC Catheterization
NCT07594704 · Status: RECRUITING · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 284
Last updated 2026-05-22
Summary
This prospective randomized controlled trial compares the effectiveness and safety of one-needle and two-needle tunneling techniques for peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC) placement, aiming to identify the optimal tunneling method to reduce catheter-related complications.
Conditions
- PICC Line Placement
- PICC-associated Thrombosis
Interventions
- OTHER
-
One-needle tunnel technique
1. Local anesthesia is administered at the puncture site,Ultrasound guidance is used for vascular puncture and assisted subcutaneous tunnel creation,the puncture needle travels 4 cm through the subcutaneous tissue before entering the blood vessel; 2. The guide wire is inserted along the puncture needle; 3. skin dilation; 4. The vascular sheath is advanced into the blood vessel via the guide wire, and the catheter is inserted through the vascular sheath; 5. The catheter tip position is confirmed, and the catheter is secured.
- OTHER
-
two-needle tunnel technique
Two-needle tunnel PICC procedure: 1. Local anesthesia at puncture and catheter exit sites; 2. Ultrasound-guided vascular puncture at puncture site, guide wire inserted via puncture needle; 3. Skin dilation at both puncture and exit sites; 4. 4cm saline tunnel created with 0.9% NaCl: 10mL syringe advanced along tunnel path while injecting solution; 5. Subcutaneous tunnel formed from exit site to puncture site with tunneling tool, catheter pulled through tunnel to puncture site; 6. Vascular sheath inserted over guide wire, catheter trimmed to length, advanced through sheath after guide wire removal; 7. Vascular sheath peeled off, catheter adjusted to proper position; 8. Catheter tip position confirmed; 9. Puncture site closed with suture-free tape, both sites covered with sterile dressings, catheter secured.
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
Sun Yat-sen University
lead OTHER
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- OTHER
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 18 Years
- Max Age
- 75 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- No
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2026-04-01
- Primary Completion
- 2026-06-30
- Completion
- 2026-07-30
Countries
- China
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
Application of Intracavity Electrocardiogram Positioning Technique in PICC
NCT05555160 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
The Relationship Between the Lack of AT-Ⅲ, PC, PS Activity and PICC-related Thrombosis
NCT04535206 ·Status: UNKNOWN
-
Comparing the Safety and Effectiveness of Tunnel PICC Guided by EDUG and Conventional PICC
NCT05621473 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of Tissue Glue on PICC and Midline Catheters Insertion Sites
NCT04900740 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
The Clinical Efficacy of Midline Catheters
NCT03457259 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter (PICC) Thrombosis: Reverse Taper Versus Non-tapered Catheters
NCT00728819 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
A Clinical Trial Evaluating the Effectiveness and Safety of the PowerMe Midline Catheter in the Chinese Population
NCT04719377 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Clinical Outcomes of Mini Midline Catheters With Different Placement Sites: a Randomized Controlled Trial
NCT06106659 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Midline Catheter Versus Long Peripheral Intravenous Catheter in Hospitalized Adult Patients
NCT05884294 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Central Line Study
NCT05534971 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Non Dilation on the Central Venous Catheterization(NDCVC-01)
NCT06652191 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Major Complications Related to PICC and Midline Insertion
NCT02489721 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Study Comparing the Efficacy of Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter (PICC) Placement With the Addition of Cyanoacrylate Glue Versus PICC Placement Alone in Patients With Cancer.
NCT05944900 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Study on the Incidence of Early Deep Vein Thrombosis After Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter Insertion
NCT02752984 ·Status: UNKNOWN
-
Comparison of Two Peripheral Inserted Intravenous Catheters
NCT04140916 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
SmartPICC-1 Feasibility Study Technical Feasibility Study
NCT05548192 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Risk of Central Venous Stenosis in Patients With Chronic Renal Failure After IJ Line Placement
NCT01988766 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Study of Complication Rates Associated With PICC for Left vs Right
NCT01638702 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparing Arrow PICC Catheters w/ Arrowga+rd Blue Advanced Protection Performance and Safety to Unprotected PICC's
NCT05278507 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
A Multicentre Pilot Study of Midline Catheter's Tip at a Different Position in Antimicrobial Therapy
NCT04601597 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter Placement by Interventional Radiologists Using the Sonic Flashlight
NCT00226213 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE1
-
Evaluating the Use of Grip Exercises to Decrease Deep Vein Thrombosis in Adult Patients With PICC Lines
NCT06370702 ·Status: ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Early Phase Infections Risk Between Midline and Piccline Caheters: MIDLINE AND PICCLINE CATHETERS
NCT05264402 ·Status: UNKNOWN
-
Vascular Access in Cancer Patients - PICC vs PORT in a Randomized Controlled Trial.
NCT01971021 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison Between Initial Routine PICC and General IV Access in Terminally Ill Cancer Patients
NCT03299868 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE2