MedTrace Logo

Midline Catheter Versus Long Peripheral Intravenous Catheter in Hospitalized Adult Patients

NCT05884294 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 102

Last updated 2025-06-18

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

This research seeks to compare two types of vascular access (catheters that are inserted into the vein) for patient treatment during hospitalization. This research will evaluate how long each catheter lasts before presenting problems that may lead to its removal from the vein (the most common are swelling on the site of the catheter, clogging of the catheter, infections, or other less common problems. Each patient will be randomly selected to receive either catheter. In this study, we will also estimate how much each patient will spend if any of the problems mentioned occur.

Conditions

  • Vascular Access Devices

Interventions

DEVICE

PowerGlide Pro Midline catheter.

The Intervention Group will be represented by hospitalized adult clinical patients who have been identified with difficult intravenous access. These patients will receive an ultrasound-guided insertion of the PowerGlide ProTM Midline 20G (10 cm).

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Hospital de Clinicas de Porto Alegre

    lead OTHER

Principal Investigators

  • Eneida R Rabelo da Silva, ScD · Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
OTHER
Masking
SINGLE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
18 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2024-01-02
Primary Completion
2025-02-27
Completion
2025-03-01

Countries

  • Brazil

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT05884294 on ClinicalTrials.gov