MedTrace Logo

Comparison of Two Peripheral Inserted Intravenous Catheters

NCT04140916 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 304

Last updated 2024-07-15

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

Central venous catheters are routinely used, however, with a complication rate exceeding 15%. Therefore, other types of venous catheters have been introduced such as a midline catheter. The purpose of the present study is to assess the efficacy and the safety of midline catheters compared to the standard care being a central catheter also inserted peripherally. Patients with indication for intravenous fluids or medicines for 5 to 28 days will be included in the study.

Conditions

  • Catheter-Related Infections
  • Catheter Related Complication

Interventions

DEVICE

Midline catheter

Peripherally inserted short intravenous catheter

DEVICE

PICC-line catheter

Peripherally inserted long intravenous catheter

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Aalborg University Hospital

    lead OTHER

Principal Investigators

  • Bodil S Rasmussen, MD · Aalborg University Hospital

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
SINGLE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
18 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2018-10-07
Primary Completion
2022-06-30
Completion
2022-12-31

Countries

  • Denmark

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT04140916 on ClinicalTrials.gov