MedTrace Logo

Comparison of Early Phase Infections Risk Between Midline and Piccline Caheters: MIDLINE AND PICCLINE CATHETERS

NCT05264402 · Status: UNKNOWN · Type: OBSERVATIONAL · Enrollment: 1000

Last updated 2022-03-03

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

A long-term venous access is frequently required in patient management. Currently, it is ensured by using the long peripheral intravenous catheters (Midline) or peripheral inserted central catheters (PICC line). Either is inserted into a peripheral vein of the upper arm and extends to the distal axillary vein.

If the indications for the two catheters can sometimes be debated, the Midline catheter seems to be more and more used. The complications related to the use of PICC lines have been well described in literature, whereas the comparison of the two catheter-related complications has been less analysed.

The aim of this study is to compare the incidences of catheter-related bloodstream infections linked to PICCs and Midlines.

Conditions

  • Catheter-related Bloodstream Infection

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • University Hospital, Brest

    lead OTHER

Eligibility

Min Age
18 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
Yes

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2021-11-15
Primary Completion
2022-11-30
Completion
2022-11-30

Countries

  • France

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT05264402 on ClinicalTrials.gov