Restoring Sinus Rhythm Using Dual-Shock Technique in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation
NCT07560644 · Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING · Phase: PHASE2/PHASE3 · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 177
Last updated 2026-05-07
Summary
The goal of this clinical trial is to assess the efficacy and acute safety of the dual electrical cardioversion (ECV) technique compared with the conventional ECV in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation. The main question it aims to answer are:
* Is dual ECV more effective than conventional ECV to achieve sinus rhythm restoration?
* Is dual ECV safe compared with conventional ECV?
* Which are the main factors associated with cardioversion success?
Researchers will compare a dual ECV technique with 400J with dual ECV with 200J and conventional ECV.
Participants will be randomized to one ECV configuration. The primary efficacy endpoint will be considered the percentage of patients with successful cardioversion with the first shock. The coprimary safety endpoint will be the occurrence of adverse events during ECV.
Conditions
- Atrial Fibrillation (AF)
- Atrial Fibrillation
Interventions
- PROCEDURE
-
Conventional Electrical Cardioversion
Defibrillation pads will be placed in the anteroposterior or anterolateral position. An initial biphasic shock of 200 J will be delivered. If sinus rhythm is not restored, a second dual shock of 400 J (crossover) will be administered. The procedures will be performed in the designated area for such procedures at each center, under deep sedation in accordance with each center's standard protocols. The choice of medication used for sedation will be at the investigator's discretion. All shocks will be delivered using biphasic energy and ECG-synchronized.
- PROCEDURE
-
Dual-shock Electrical Cardioversion
Two pairs of defibrillation pads connected to two different defibrillators will be used. One pair of pads will be placed in the anterolateral position and the second pair in the anteroposterior position. Both defibrillators will be programmed to deliver a biphasic shock of 100 J each (200 J group) or 200 J each (400 J group) simultaneously. The maximum number of CVE attempts per patient will be 3. The procedures will be performed in the designated area for such procedures at each center, under deep sedation in accordance with each center's standard protocols. The choice of medication used for sedation will be at the investigator's discretion. All shocks will be delivered using biphasic energy and synchronized with the QRS complex.
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
Martín Negreira Caamaño
lead OTHER
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Model
- SEQUENTIAL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 18 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- No
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2026-05-01
- Primary Completion
- 2027-12-31
- Completion
- 2028-02-27
More Related Trials
-
Cardiac Autonomic Denervation for Cardio-inhibitory Syncope
NCT05572034 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Conduction System Pacing Versus Biventricular Resynchronization in Patients With Chronic Heart Failure
NCT05572736 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Antero-posterior Versus Antero-lateral Electrode Position for Electrical Cardioversion of Typical Atrial Flutter
NCT00860314 ·Status: TERMINATED ·Phase: NA
-
Ventricular Electrical Synchronization by Stimulating Left and Right Bundle Branches Area in Pacing-indicated Patients
NCT04023890 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
RESynchronisation in Patients With Heart Failure and a Normal QRS Duration
NCT00480051 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE3
-
Left vs Left Randomized Clinical Trial
NCT05650658 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Ideal Pacer Pad Position Study
NCT03898050 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
The Effects of Anodal Stimulation on Echocardiographic Outcome in Patients With Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy
NCT00825006 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Efficacy and Safety of Synchronized Cardiac Support in Cardiogenic Shock Patients
NCT05106491 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Impact of Catheter Ablation of Ventricular Arrhythmias on Suboptimal Biventricular Pacing in Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy
NCT04065893 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Sympathetic Ablation for Ventricular Arrhythmias
NCT07501819 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation and Cardiac Sympathetic Overdrive in Heart Failure
NCT03354689 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
A Study of Triple-site Ventricular Pacing in Patients Who Have Not Responded to Conventional Dual Ventricular Site Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy
NCT00941850 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
To Determine Optimal Time for Delivering Electrical Shocks to Cardiac Arrest Patients
NCT01665755 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Postoperative Atrial Fibrillation Suppression By Nerve Stimulation
NCT03533140 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Impact of Catheter Ablation of Frequent Premature Ventricular Complexes in Treating Subtle Left Cardiomyopathy
NCT06864429 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Renal Denervation in Patients With Heart Failure With Normal LV Ejection Fraction
NCT02115230 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
The Effect of Simulated Obstructive Apnoea and Hypopnoea on Heart Rhythm in Patients With Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation
NCT01796080 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Endocardial Pacing in On-table Non-responders in Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy
NCT01193712 ·Status: WITHDRAWN ·Phase: NA
-
Cardioinhibitory Reflex Syncope. Permanent Pacemaker Therapy or Cardioneuroablation?
NCT05855603 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Atrioventricular Optimization for Dual Chamber Pacemaker
NCT03556189 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
MAX - SHOCK Clinical Trial
NCT06556667 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Prognostic Value of Sympathetic Modulation in Patients With Heart Failure
NCT02047409 ·Status: UNKNOWN
-
Cardiac Sympathetic Denervation in Patients With Refractory Arrhythmic Storm: a Single-center Case Series
NCT07375264 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Ventricular Tachycardia in Ischemic Cardiomyopathy; a Combined Endo-Epicardial Ablation Within the First Procedure Versus a Stepwise Approach
NCT02358746 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA