MedTrace Logo

Videolaryngoscope vs VideoLMA for Endotracheal Intubation in RIRS

NCT07555535 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 100

Last updated 2026-06-16

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

This study is a prospective, randomized, parallel-group clinical trial comparing videolaryngoscope and videoLMA for endotracheal intubation in adult patients undergoing surgery. Patients will be randomly assigned into two groups. The primary outcome is intubation time. Secondary outcomes include first attempt success rate, number of attempts, oxygen desaturation, hemodynamic changes, and postoperative complications.

Conditions

  • Urolithiasis
  • Airway Management

Interventions

DEVICE

Videolaryngoscope

Patients undergoing endotracheal intubation using videolaryngoscope

DEVICE

VideoLMA

Patients undergoing endotracheal intubation using videoLMA

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Ela Erdem Hıdiroglu

    lead OTHER_GOV

Principal Investigators

  • Ela Erdem Hidiroglu, MD · Ankara Etlik City Hospital

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
18 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
Yes

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2026-04-28
Primary Completion
2026-05-30
Completion
2026-06-14

Countries

  • Turkey (Türkiye)

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT07555535 on ClinicalTrials.gov