MedTrace Logo

LMA® Gastro Airway Versus Gastro-Laryngeal Tube in Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography

NCT04196582 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 100

Last updated 2020-11-03

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

Comparison of second generation supraglottic airway devices about anesthesiologist, endoscopist and patient, which used for gastrointestinal procedures. The investigators believe that the endoscope will be easier to reach by the part of GLT extending to the esophagus, but the structural stiffness of this part may damage the esophageal mucosa. On the other hand, since the endoscopic canal of the LMA® Gastro ends at the upper end of the esophagus, it may be more difficult to orient the endoscope to the esophagus, but it may be superior in terms of ventilation efficiency. Therefore these two device worth for comparing.

Conditions

  • Supraglottic Airway Efficiency
  • Airway Complication of Anesthesia
  • Airway Aspiration
  • Complication of Anesthesia
  • Esophagus Injury
  • Endoscopic Ergonomics
  • ERCP Airway Management

Interventions

DEVICE

Comparison of LMA Gastro Airway® and Gastro-Laryngeal Tube in patients who will undergo biliopancreatic procedures.

comparing efficiency and complications of second generation airway devices which can use for gastrointestinally procedures

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Bezmialem Vakif University

    lead OTHER

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
18 Years
Max Age
70 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2019-11-20
Primary Completion
2020-06-20
Completion
2020-07-10

Countries

  • Turkey (Türkiye)

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT04196582 on ClinicalTrials.gov