Evaluation of Implants Placed Without Bone Grafts in Two Different Sinus Floor Elevation Techniques.
NCT04309682 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 22
Last updated 2024-08-26
Summary
Statement of the problem: Vertical bone height reduction after extraction in the posterior maxilla complicates the treatment plan. Lateral sinus elevation, crestal sinus elevation, using short implants and different grafting procedures are some of the proposed treatment protocols, however, there is still a gap of knowledge in high quality evidence for the most effective approach. Purpose : The aim of the study is to evaluate clinical long term implant stability and radiographic vertical bone height gain after implant placement in posterior maxilla using crestal sinus approach in comparison to lateral sinus elevation technique. Materials and Methods: Thirty patients have single maxillary posterior tooth in atrophic maxilla will be enrolled. Patients will be allocated randomly into two groups; group 1 (test group) will receive implants using crestal sinus approach and group 2 (control group) will be assigned to the lateral sinus elevation technique, no bone grafts will be placed in both groups. Resonance frequency analysis will be employed to measure implant stability with a dedicated device (Osstell). For each implant, implant stability quotient ISQ values will be measured from the four sites.The mean of all measurements will be rounded to a whole number and regarded as the final ISQ of the implant. ISQ values will be obtained after implant insertion, at 3 months after delivery of the final restoration, at 6 and 12 months post-surgical. CBCT will be taken at 3 \&12 months follow up periods, to assess the amount of bone height gained around the dental implants in both groups.
Conditions
- Dental Implant Placement
Interventions
- PROCEDURE
-
crestal sinus approach technique
a Full thickness flap will be elevated at the edentulous site with two vertical releasing incision and then the preparation of osteotomy will be prepared following standard implant system protocol preparation of the osteotomy. Drilling will be done gently till reaching 0-1mm from the sinus floor, then implant placement will take place and the implant itself will be used to gently elevate the sinus up to 3-5mm.
- PROCEDURE
-
Lateral sinus approach
a full-thickness flap will be elevated at the edentulous site with two vertical releasing incisions extending to the vestibule for better reflection and exposure to the lateral wall of the sinus. The lateral antrostomy will be prepared in the lateral sinus wall using rotary bur no. 8 to provide adequate access to remove the thin to thick cortical bone and to expose the thin sinus membrane. The membrane will be elevated across the sinus floor and up the medial wall and this elevation must extend anteriorly-posteriorly to provide the exposed sinus floor. Drilling will be done gently till reaching 0-1mm from the sinus floor, then implant placement will take place
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
Misr International University
lead OTHER
Principal Investigators
-
Ahmed I Abo El Futtouh, Master · Clinical Director of Implant Program - Misr International University
-
Inas M El-Zayat, Doctor · Assoc. Professor - Operative department, Misr International University
-
Mariam S Hanna, Bsc · Dentist/Researcher - IDCE
-
Nael A Mina, Bsc · Misr International University
-
Abdel Rahman A Abdel Rahman, Master · International Dental Contiuing Education
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- BASIC_SCIENCE
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 18 Years
- Max Age
- 50 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- Yes
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2021-12-01
- Primary Completion
- 2024-07-01
- Completion
- 2024-08-21
Countries
- Egypt
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
Radiographic Evaluation of Bone Height Gain With Dental Implant Placed Simultaneously With Closed Sinus Lifting Using Hydraulic Lift Technique Versus Summers' Osteotome Technique in Posterior Edentulous Maxilla (RCT)
NCT04648514 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Maxillary Sinus Floor Elevation With Gelatin Sponge Versus Allogenic Demineralized Bone Matrix
NCT06681857 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Implants Placed With Crestal Sinus Approach Versus Osseodensification in Atrophic Posterior Maxilla
NCT06207578 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Radiographic Assessment of Bone Gain Following Sinus Lifting With Simultaneous Implant Placement Using Crestal Approach With Membrane Control Technique for Bone Augmentation of Atrophied Maxillary Posterior Ridge
NCT06446687 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of Two Different Techniques for Sinus Elevation, Open Versus Closed .
NCT06265467 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Grafting of the Peri-implant Bony Defects Around Immediate Implants Using Xenogenic Versus Alloplastic Sticky Grafts: Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial
NCT06653868 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Stability of Short Implants Versus Standard Blx Implants With Internal Sinus Floor Elevation in Posterior Maxilla
NCT05779345 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of Bone Height Gain Following Trans-crestal Sinus Floor Elevation
NCT05411510 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
The Influence of Vertical Implant Position on the Marginal Bone Loss in Thick Versus Thin Phenotype.
NCT06177275 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Efficacy of Different Techniques of Crestal Sinus Lifting
NCT05735613 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Assessment Crestal Maxillary Sinus Membrane Elevation Using Different Implant Heights
NCT05166434 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE1
-
Clinical and Radiographic Evaluation of Crestal Bone Loss Around Implant With or Without Platform Switching Design
NCT02761226 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE2
-
Dental Implant Approach for Crestal Sinus Elevation; A Novel Technique.
NCT05777239 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Assessment of Dimensional Changes Following Grafting With Microfragmented Adipose Tissue Loaded on Allograft on Ridge Preservation
NCT06636461 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of Marginal Bone Loss After Immediate Implant Placement in Maxillary Esthetic Zone With Nanobone Versus Xenograft
NCT03536260 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Radiographic Evaluation of The Labial Bone Dimensional Changes After Immediate Implant
NCT05360693 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of Vertical Height in Anterior Maxillary Sandwich Osteotomy: Simultaneous Versus Delayed Implant Placement
NCT04022538 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Marginal Bone Height Changes Around Two Different Surface Treated Dental Implants Supporting Mandibular Complete Overdenture.
NCT04800406 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluate Marginal B. Loss in Immediate Implant Placement in Maxillary Esthetic Zone Using Socket Shield Versus Xenograft
NCT03394625 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Graftless Technique in Open Maxillary Sinus Lifting Using PEEK Versus Ti -Meshwork
NCT06846632 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Bond Apatite in Horizontal Augmentation Versus Bio-Oss
NCT06043258 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of the Efficacy of Allograft Versus Tenting Technique in Open Sinus Lifting With Immediate Implant Placement
NCT06254378 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Transcrestal Sinus Lift Using Osseodensification Versus Lateral Window Technique
NCT06126536 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Osseodensification by Densah Burs Versus Osteotome
NCT04688957 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of Bone Changes Around Implants in Patients Treated With All on Four
NCT06723678 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA