Minimaly Ivnasive Surgery for Grade III Hemorrhoids
NCT07534761 · Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING · Type: OBSERVATIONAL · Enrollment: 50
Last updated 2026-04-21
Summary
Hemorrhoids are vascular-elastic structures of the anal canal that contribute to continence. Their enlargement and descent lead to symptoms such as rectal bleeding and the sensation of anal swelling, known as hemorrhoidal syndrome. In advanced cases (Goligher Grade III-IV), surgery is the only effective treatment. Closed excisional hemorrhoidectomy (CEH), based on the Ferguson technique, is one of the standard procedures. Although effective in the long term, it causes severe postoperative pain. Minimally invasive surgery (MIS) employs enhanced visualization devices to improve surgical precision and reduce tissue damage. While widely used in specialties with small surgical fields, it has not yet been explored in anal surgery. Its advantages include reduced tissue injury and improved healing, although it presents a learning curve and an initially longer surgical time. The IDEAL framework evaluates surgical innovations in five stages: Idea, Development, Exploration, Evaluation, and Long-Term Study. The IDEAL phase 2a is aimed at the optimization and technical definition of surgical innovation with a focus on continuous improvement based on real clinical practice, laying the foundation for broader and more rigorous subsequent studies.
Since no previous studies on the application of MIS in CEH have been found, the investigators propose a study within Stage 2A of the IDEAL model to assess the reproducibility of this technique. The investigators believe its incorporation into closed excisional hemorrhoidectomy could result in less postoperative pain and faster patient recovery.
Conditions
- Hemorrhoidectomy
- Minimally Invasive Surgical Technique
Interventions
- PROCEDURE
-
Minimally Invasive hemorrhoidectomy
The investigators propose applying minimally invasive surgery in closed excisional hemorrhoidectomy (CEH) , the most effective technique for treating advanced hemorrhoidal disease. The investigators believe this approach will reduce postoperative pain and improve recovery while maintaining the excellent outcomes of CEH. The investigator's hypothesis is based on the reduced tissue trauma and increased precision provided by minimally invasive surgery.
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
Hospital Son Llatzer
lead OTHER
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 18 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- No
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2026-06-01
- Primary Completion
- 2026-12-01
- Completion
- 2027-12-01
Countries
- Spain
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
Comparison Between Excisional Hemorrhoidectomy and Haemorrhoidal Dearterialisation With Anopexy
NCT01263431 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Hemorrhoidal Artery Ligation and Rectoanal Repair Versus Stapled Hemorrhoidopexy
NCT01647763 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Trans-anal Hemorrhoidal Dearterialization (THD) vs. Hemorrhoidectomy
NCT01244672 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Low Excision and High Suspension Hemorrhoidectomy Versus Conventional Milligan-Morgan Hemorrhoidectomy for Grade III-IV Mixed Hemorrhoids
NCT07495046 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Multicenter Prospective Real-world Observational Study to Evaluate the Effectiveness of Phlebotonics, as Conservative Therapy in a Cohort of Patients With Symptomatic Hemorrhoidal Disease (HD) of I, II or III Goligher Grade
NCT07376928 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Recto Anal Repair or Milligan Morgans Operation of Grade 3 and 4 Symptomatic Haemorrhoidal Disease
NCT01038141 ·Status: TERMINATED ·Phase: NA
-
Multicenter Prospective Trial on Hemorrhoids
NCT03245086 ·Status: UNKNOWN
-
Polidocanol Foam VS Artery Ligation in Hemorrhoidal Disease
NCT04675177 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE2/PHASE3
-
Traditional Ferguson Hemorrhoidectomy vs Stapled Hemorrhoidopexy
NCT05959577 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Minimal Invasive Laser Hemorrhoidoplasty vs Conventional Excisional Hemorrhoidectomy in II-III Grade Hemorrhoidal Disease
NCT04944407 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Doppler-guided Haemorrhoidal Artery Ligation With Suture Mucopexy vs. Suture Mucopexy Alone
NCT02372981 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Transanal Haemorrhoidal Dearterialisation Versus Stapler Haemorrhoidopexy
NCT01615575 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Ligasure Versus Diathermy Haemorrhoidectomy Under Local Anesthesia
NCT00617448 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Study About Patient Comfort and Long-term Outcome After Stapled Hemorrhoidopexy
NCT01533363 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE3
-
Safety and Short Term Effectiveness of EEA Versus PPH Stapler for III Degree Hemorrhoids
NCT01413867 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE3
-
THD Versus Open Haemorrhoidectomy
NCT02061176 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Outcomes After Laser Hemorrhoidoplasty
NCT07520734 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING
-
Thrombosed External Hemorrhoids: Comparison of the Thrombectomy and Local Excision Procedures in Terms of Results and Outcome (TEH)
NCT03903536 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Hemorrhoids: Options of Traditional Hemorrhoidectomy
NCT06132152 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of the Technique LHP (Laser HemorrhoidoPlasty) in Haemorrhoidal Prolapse Mini Invasive Surgery
NCT03322527 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Stapled Anopexy Versus Closed Haemorrhoidectomy for Haemorrhoids
NCT00397137 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
HEmorrhoidAl Disease in Inflammatory Bowel Disease: a Multicenter Prospective Cohort Study
NCT06638814 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING
-
A Prospective Evaluation of Hemorrhoidal Surgery Outcome in Istanbul
NCT05429060 ·Status: UNKNOWN
-
HAL-RAR Versus Hemorrhoidectomy in the Treatment of Grade III-IV Hemorrhoids. Prospective, Randomized Trial
NCT02216305 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Multicentrique Prospective Evaluation of Radiofrequency Surgical Treatment of Homorrhoidal Disease
NCT04229784 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA