Traditional Ferguson Hemorrhoidectomy vs Stapled Hemorrhoidopexy

NCT05959577 · Status: RECRUITING · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 200

Last updated 2024-09-20

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

This study aimed to compare the short- and long-term outcomes of stapled hemorrhoidopexy (the procedure for prolapsed hemorrhoids, PPH) with anoplasty versus traditional Ferguson method for the treatment of patients with grade III /IV hemorrhoids.

Conditions

  • Haemorrhoid

Interventions

PROCEDURE

Stapled hemorrhoidopexy with anoplasty

The patients who meet the inclusion and exclusion criteria in this group will undergo Stapled hemorrhoidopexy with anoplasty.

PROCEDURE

Ferguson hemorrhoidectomy

Ferguson hemorrhoidectomy

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • National Taiwan University Hospital

    lead OTHER

Principal Investigators

  • Jin-Tung LIANG, MD · National Taiwan University Hospital

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
25 Years
Max Age
75 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2022-08-17
Primary Completion
2026-12-31
Completion
2026-12-31

Countries

  • Taiwan

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT05959577 on ClinicalTrials.gov