Ligasure Versus Diathermy Haemorrhoidectomy Under Local Anesthesia
NCT00617448 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 81
Last updated 2008-02-18
Summary
The objective of this prospective randomised trial was to compare the short- and long-term efficacy of conventional diathermy haemorrhoidectomy versus Ligasure™ diathermy, and to assess the short-term outcome of each procedure performed either under spinal anaesthesia or local anaesthesia with pudendal block with ropivacaine combined with intravenous sedation.
We think, Ligasure haemorrhoidectomy under local anesthesia can be performed as day-case procedure and with equal results at long-term than conventional diathermy (considered goal standar of haemorrhoidectomy).
Conditions
Interventions
- PROCEDURE
-
diathermy haemorrhoidectomy under espinal anesthesia
For surgery: conventional haemorrhoidectomy with diathermy (Milligan-Morgan).For anesthesia: lidocaine 2% at doses of 50-70 mg was used for spinal anaesthesia.
- PROCEDURE
-
diathermy haemorrhoidectomy under local anesthesia
For surgery: conventional haemorrhoidectomy with diathermy (Milligan-Morgan). For anesthesia: pudendal nerve block, infiltration of the right and left pararectal spaces, anterior and presacral regions with ropivacaine (150 mg of ropivacaine \[20 mL, 7.5 mg/mL\] diluted in 50 mL of 0.9% physiological saline). Ten minutes before local anaesthesia, patients were sedated with i.v. remifentanil 0.05-0.15 μg·kg-1
- PROCEDURE
-
Ligasure haemorrhoidetomy under spinal anestesia
For surgery: ligasure haemorrhoidectomy For anesthesia: lidocaine 2% at doses of 50-70 mg was used for spinal anaesthesia.
- PROCEDURE
-
Ligasure haemorrhoidectomy under local anesthesia
For surgery: haemorrhoidectomy with Ligasure For anesthesia: pudendal nerve block, infiltration of the right and left pararectal spaces, anterior and presacral regions with ropivacaine (150 mg of ropivacaine \[20 mL, 7.5 mg/mL\] diluted in 50 mL of 0.9% physiological saline). Ten minutes before local anaesthesia, patients were sedated with i.v. remifentanil 0.05-0.15 μg·kg-1
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
Fundacio per la recerca e investigació del Hospital de Viladecans
collaborator UNKNOWN -
Hospital de Viladecans
lead OTHER
Principal Investigators
-
Pi F Siques, Professor · Barcelona university of Medicine (Departement Ciencies Cliniques)
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 20 Years
- Max Age
- 90 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- No
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2005-05-31
- Primary Completion
- 2006-06-30
- Completion
- 2007-06-30
Countries
- Spain
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
Longo's Intervention in the Treatment of Hemorrhoids and Rectal Mucosal Prolapse
NCT03383926 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of the Value of Perianal Infiltration During Thermodestruction of Haemorrhoidal Disease by Radiofrequency
NCT05519189 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Implementation of Minimally Invasive Surgery for Grade III Hemorrhoids
NCT06851312 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Radiofrequency Ablation vs Doppler-guided Haemorrhoidal Artery Ligation in the Treatment of Haemorrhoidal Disease
NCT06170736 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Local Versus General Anaesthesia in Stapled Hemorrhoidectomy
NCT00512044 ·Status: WITHDRAWN ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Symptom Control 1-year After Circular Stapler Anopexy or Diathermy Excision for Prolapsed Haemorhoids
NCT00841620 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Ligation and Hemorrhoidopexy Technique Versus Ligation of Hemorrhoidal Arteries Using Ultrasound for Hemorrhoids
NCT03298997 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Doppler-guided Haemorrhoidal Artery Ligation With Suture Mucopexy vs. Suture Mucopexy Alone
NCT02372981 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Recto-Anal-Repair in the Treatment of Advanced Haemorrhoidal Disease
NCT01301209 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Efficacy of Rectal Infiltration of Exparel for Analgesic Benefit Following Hemorrhoidectomy
NCT02104414 ·Status: TERMINATED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
HAL-RAR Versus Hemorrhoidectomy in the Treatment of Grade III-IV Hemorrhoids. Prospective, Randomized Trial
NCT02216305 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Polidocanol Foam Versus Rubber Band Ligation in the Treatment of Hemorrhoidal Disease
NCT04091763 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE2
-
Hemorrhoid Artery LigatioN Without Doppler Trial
NCT04119401 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Mucopexy Versus Laser Hemorrhoidoplasty for the Treatment of Hemorrhoidal Disease
NCT04881344 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
THD Versus Open Haemorrhoidectomy
NCT02061176 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Hemorrhoid Radiofrequency
NCT06079892 ·Status: RECRUITING
-
Feasibility of Superior Rectal Artery Embolization for the Treatment of Hemorrhoidal Disease
NCT02303925 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Napoleon Trial: Optimal Treatment for Recurrent Haemorrhoidal Disease
NCT04101773 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Efficacy and Safety of RAdiofrequency Versus HAL- RAR DOppler in Hemorrhoidal Pathology
NCT04896268 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Open Hemorrohoidectomy Vs Transanal Hemorrhoidal Desarterialization in Hemorrhoids Grade III: The Effect on Symptoms
NCT06420986 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison Study: Ligasure Versus Conventional Hemorrhoidectomy in III and IV Degree Hemorrhoids.
NCT03848468 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
IntraopeRativE Use of periNeal Block for Hemorrhoidectomy
NCT04288349 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Hemorrhoidal Artery Ligation and Rectoanal Repair Versus Stapled Hemorrhoidopexy
NCT01647763 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Trans-anal Hemorrhoidal Dearterialization (THD) vs. Hemorrhoidectomy
NCT01244672 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
The Use of Topical Anaesthetic in the Banding of Internal Haemorrhoids
NCT04031131 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE2