Microbiological Evaluation of the Effectiveness of Different Surface Decontamination Protocols for Dental Implants
NCT07529444 · Status: RECRUITING · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 90
Last updated 2026-04-14
Summary
The purpose of this prospective clinical study is to evaluate and compare the effectiveness of different cleaning (decontamination) methods for dental implants affected by peri-implantitis. Peri-implantitis is an inflammatory condition caused by a bacterial biofilm on the implant surface, which can lead to bone loss and implant failure if left untreated. Because the rough surface and threads of implants make them difficult to clean, finding the most effective decontamination method is critical for saving the implant.
This study will include 90 healthy, non-smoking participants who have a bone-level dental implant affected by peri-implantitis without vertical bone loss. Participants will be randomly assigned to one of three treatment groups (30 implants per group) to undergo a specific decontamination procedure during their surgical treatment:
Group 1 (Laser PDT): Decontamination using photodynamic therapy with a blue laser and riboflavin, followed by a sterile saline rinse.
Group 2 (GalvoSurge): Decontamination using an electrolytic cleaning device, followed by a sterile saline rinse.
Group 3 (Active Control): Decontamination using a 0.2% chlorhexidine gluconate rinse, which is the current standard of care.
To measure the effectiveness of these treatments, researchers will take sterile swabs from the implant surface immediately before and after the decontamination process. These swabs will be analyzed using PCR to detect changes in the microbiological load of five specific bacteria known to cause gum and implant disease (Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans, Porphyromonas gingivalis, Prevotella intermedia, Treponema denticola, and Tannerella forsythia).
Following the decontamination and swabbing, all participants will receive a standard Guided Bone Regeneration (GBR) procedure using autogenous bone, a xenograft, and a collagen membrane to help rebuild the bone around the implant.
By comparing the microbiological results before and after treatment, the study aims to determine whether the newer methods (Laser PDT or electrolytic cleaning) are more effective at removing harmful bacteria than the traditional chlorhexidine rinse prior to bone regeneration.
Conditions
- Periimplant Diseases
- Dental Implant Failure
- Dental Implant Complications
Interventions
- DEVICE
-
Laser Photodynamic Therapy (PDT)
Antimicrobial photodynamic therapy applied to the contaminated implant surface. This involves the application of a riboflavin photosensitizer which is then activated by a blue laser to generate reactive oxygen species and eliminate bacterial biofilm. The procedure is concluded with a sterile normal saline rinse. Arm Group(s): Laser PDT + Saline Rinse
- DEVICE
-
GalvoSurge Electrolytic Cleaning
Decontamination of the implant surface using the GalvoSurge dental device. This system utilizes an electrolytic process with a specific cleaning solution to actively lift and detach the bacterial biofilm from the rough titanium surface. The procedure is concluded with a sterile normal saline rinse. Arm Group(s): GalvoSurge + Saline Rinse
- DRUG
-
0.2% Chlorhexidine Gluconate
Chemical decontamination of the implant surface by rinsing it thoroughly with a 0.2% chlorhexidine gluconate solution, which serves as the active control/gold standard for antimicrobial reduction. Arm Group(s): Chlorhexidine Rinse (Control)
- PROCEDURE
-
Guided Bone Regeneration (GBR)
A classic surgical bone grafting procedure performed on all implants immediately following their assigned decontamination protocol. The procedure involves placing a mixture of autologous bone particles and a xenograft around the implant, which is then covered by a collagen membrane fixed in place using titanium pins. Arm Group(s): Laser PDT + Saline Rinse; GalvoSurge + Saline Rinse; Chlorhexidine Rinse (Control)
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
University of Zagreb
lead OTHER
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Masking
- NONE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- No
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2026-03-01
- Primary Completion
- 2027-03-01
- Completion
- 2027-06-01
Countries
- Croatia
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
Influence of Implant Surface Decontamination on the Reconstructive Outcomes of Peri-implantitis
NCT05615051 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Decontamination Methods in the Treatment of Peri-implantitis
NCT07500844 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Erythritol vs Ultrasonic Scaler Prophylaxis Systems on Dental Implants With Crowns Made by Different Materials
NCT06288919 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
The Effect of Photodynamic Therapy on Plaque in Orthodontic Patients
NCT06331442 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Guided Biofilm Therapy Compared to Traditional Cleaning for Treating Gingival Inflammation in Orthodontic Patients
NCT07355517 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Study to Examine Brushing on Dental Implants
NCT00762619 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE3
-
Evaluation of Photodynamic Therapy in Treatment of Peri-implantitis
NCT05187663 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Antimicrobial Agent for Reducing Bacteria in Aerosols and Oral Cavity
NCT02319668 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Surgical Protocol for Peri-Implantitis Treatment-4
NCT03977298 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Implant Healing Abutment and Chlorhexidine
NCT03142828 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Adjunctive Benefit of Electrolytic Cleaning on Non-surgical Treatment of Peri-implantitis.
NCT05179746 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Non-surgical Mechanical Debridement With or Without Full-mouth Disinfection in the Treatment of Peri-implant Mucositis
NCT05711576 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Non-surgical Treatment of Peri-implantitis Using Chitosan Brush and Tetracycline Slurry
NCT06695559 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Dental Biofilm Control During Orthodontic Treatment
NCT05532241 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: PHASE3
-
Efficacy of Photodynamic Therapy in the Non-Surgical Treatment of Peri-Implantitis
NCT07191522 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Surgical Protocol for Peri-Implantitis Treatment-3
NCT03977324 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Efficacy of 0.12% Chlorhexidine Gluconate for Peri-implant Mucositis and Gingivitis
NCT02639377 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE2
-
Ozonized In-office and Domiciliary Gels vs Chlorhexidine Gel 1% for the Management of Peri-implant Mucositis Sites
NCT05256914 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Efficacy of Air-polishing on Pain Perception and Compliance Rate
NCT06109701 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Surgical Protocol for Peri-implantitis Treatment-2
NCT03977285 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
The Use of Adjunct Oxygen High-Level Laser Therapy on the Clinical and Microbiological Outcomes of Peri-implant Disease
NCT07287956 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Treatment of Peri-implant Mucositis by Sodium Hypochlorite Gel and Cross-linked Hyaluronic Acid Gel
NCT05926297 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Antiseptic Effects on the Dental Implant Internal Surface Microbiome
NCT05024760 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: EARLY_PHASE1
-
The Effectiveness of Palatal Brushing on Denture Stomatitis
NCT02686632 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
The Adjunctive Effect of a Titanium Brush in the Non-Surgical Treatment of Peri-Implantitis
NCT06843928 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA