Immediate and Functional Results of Different Types of Reconstructions After Proximal Gastrectomy For Gastric and Esophagogastric Junction Cancer
NCT07441785 · Status: RECRUITING · Type: OBSERVATIONAL · Enrollment: 400
Last updated 2026-04-22
Summary
Proximal gastric and esophagogastric junction cancers comprise up to 40% of gastric malignancies. For localized disease, proximal gastrectomy is the main radical procedure, but reconstruction of GI tract often leads to significant functional issues.
Rising use of proximal resections and broader indications have increased attention to postoperative quality of life (QoL). Common reconstructions include direct esophagogastrostomy (various types), double-tract reconstruction, jejunal interposition, and newer anti-reflux anastomoses (e.g., double-flap, overlap, tunnel techniques).
Each method has unique pros and cons regarding reflux esophagitis, food passage, dumping syndrome, nutritional changes, and long-term QoL.
No consensus exists on the optimal technique, leading to variable practices and outcomes. Most research focuses on oncologic radicality and survival, while functional results and QoL remain understudied.
Systematic evaluation of functional outcomes across reconstruction types after proximal subtotal gastrectomy is needed in Russian Federation to improve QoL, advance research, and standardize treatment of proximal gastric and EGJ cancers.
Conditions
- Gastric Cancer (GC)
- Siewert Type III Adenocarcinoma of Esophagogastric Junction
- Siewert Type II Adenocarcinoma of Esophagogastric Junction
Interventions
- PROCEDURE
-
Proximal Gastrectomy
Resection of the upper third to one-half of the stomach and the distal portion of the esophagus with different types of digestive system reconstruction
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
A.Loginov Moscow Clinical Scientific Center
collaborator UNKNOWN -
P. Herzen Moscow Oncology Research Institute
lead OTHER_GOV
Principal Investigators
-
Andrey Ryabov, MD, PhD · P.Herzen Moscow Oncological Research Institute
-
Vladimir Khomyakov, MD, PhD · P.Herzen Moscow Oncological Research Institute
-
Nuriddin Abdulkhakimov, PhD · P.Herzen Moscow Oncological Research Institute
-
Pavel Smirnov · P.Herzen Moscow Oncological Research Institute
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 18 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- No
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2025-01-01
- Primary Completion
- 2028-12-31
- Completion
- 2029-06-01
Countries
- Russia
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
Intraoperative Adverse Events in Robotic Radical Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer
NCT05999019 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Preliminary Efficacy Analysis of 'λ+α' Double-Tract Reconstruction After Laparoscopic Proximal Gastrectomy
NCT06475170 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Extended Resection After Positive Intraoperative Pathology in Gastric Cancer Surgery
NCT05663450 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
A Prospective Study on Esophagogastrostomy by an Innovative Surgical Technique
NCT06300879 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Quality of Life After Cytoreductive Surgery and Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy
NCT03503071 ·Status: WITHDRAWN
-
Endoscopic Mucosal Resection With Circumferential Incision for Colorectal Neoplasms
NCT05690490 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Randomized Prospective Trial for Laparoscopic vs Open Resection for Rectal Cancer
NCT00470951 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE3
-
Multivisceral Resections for Locally Advanced Gastric Cancer
NCT06103435 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
PReventive cOlostomy vs Ileostomy in Low anTErior reCTal Resection
NCT04357171 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Feasibility Bowel Dysfunction Program After Low Anterior Resection
NCT04733794 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Reduced Port Laparoscopic Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer
NCT04295473 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Advanced Endoscopic Resections for Rectal Neoplasms
NCT07410767 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING
-
Prophylactic Mesh Placement During Stoma Closure After Low Anterior Resection
NCT05939687 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: PHASE3
-
Side-to-end Anastomosis Versus Colon J Pouch for Reconstruction After Low Anterior Resection for Rectal Cancer (SAVE)
NCT01006577 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Outcome of Laparoscopic Total Mesorectal Excision Versus Open Technique in Management of Rectal Carcimoma
NCT05685680 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison Between Robotic and Laparoscopic Right Hemicolectomy
NCT07350590 ·Status: TERMINATED
-
Frailty and Postoperative Outcomes After Gastric Cancer Surgery
NCT03568110 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Quality of Life and High-Risk Abdominal Cancer Surgery
NCT04444544 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Trial of Robotic Versus Laparoscopic-assisted Radical Resection for Rectal Cancer
NCT02673177 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Multicenter Study on Suprapubic Catheterization Versus Transurethral Catheterization in Laparoscopic Surgery for Rectal Cancer
NCT02728427 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
The Safety and Efficacy of Robotic Assisted Surgery Using Vessel Sealer Extend in Locally Advanced Gastric Cancer
NCT06881043 ·Status: RECRUITING
-
Comparison of Surgical,Clinical and Oncological Outcomes Between Robotic-assisted and Laparoscopic-assisted Gastrectomy
NCT02413476 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE2/PHASE3
-
Gastric Microperfusion in Patients Undergoing Gastroesophageal Resections
NCT02077673 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Rectal Reconstruction in Treating Patients Who Are Undergoing Surgery for Rectal Cancer
NCT00238381 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE3
-
Laparoscopic vs. Open Distal Gastrectomy After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy
NCT04658589 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA