The Effect of Different Digestive Tract Reconstruction Methods on Postoperative Quality of Life After Proximal Gastrectomy
NCT06929949 · Status: RECRUITING · Type: OBSERVATIONAL · Enrollment: 90
Last updated 2025-04-16
Summary
Gastric cancer ranks as the fifth most common malignancy worldwide and the fourth leading cause of cancer-related deaths. In China, its incidence and mortality rank third among all cancers. While the global incidence of gastric cancer is declining, proximal gastric cancer and adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction (AEG) are on the rise. Due to the unique characteristics of AEG, there is no standardized treatment consensus, making the selection of an optimal surgical approach and reconstruction method crucial for improving patient outcomes.
For early-stage proximal gastric cancer and AEG, total gastrectomy (TG) and proximal gastrectomy (PG) are common surgical options. PG, increasingly favored for its function-preserving benefits, has been shown to be a safe and effective alternative to TG. While TG effectively removes lymph nodes and reduces reflux risk, it leads to permanent loss of gastric function and nutritional deficiencies. PG better preserves gastrointestinal function but is limited by the risk of reflux esophagitis, highlighting the need for improved reconstruction techniques.
Several reconstruction methods exist after PG, including esophagogastric anastomosis, jejunal interposition, double-tract reconstruction (DTR), double-flap technique (DFT), and tubular gastric anastomosis, each with varying efficacy in preventing reflux. Studies suggest that DTR reduces reflux and improves quality of life compared to esophagogastric anastomosis, while DFT, first introduced in 1998, has gained popularity for its advantages in maintaining nutrition and minimizing reflux. Additionally, tubular gastric anastomosis, which constructs a narrow gastric tube to facilitate tension-free anastomosis, has shown potential benefits for AEG patients.
Most existing studies on laparoscopic or robot-assisted reconstruction techniques for proximal gastric cancer are retrospective, lacking high-quality prospective evidence. Furthermore, comparative data on their anti-reflux efficacy and postoperative quality of life remains l
Conditions
- Gastroesophageal Junction (GEJ) Cancer
- Gastric Cancer
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
The First Hospital of Jilin University
lead OTHER
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 18 Years
- Max Age
- 75 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- No
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2024-11-25
- Primary Completion
- 2028-11-25
- Completion
- 2030-11-25
Countries
- China
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
Development and Validation of a Web-based Nomorgam to Predict Postoperative Complications
NCT05301699 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Quality of Life and High-Risk Abdominal Cancer Surgery
NCT04444544 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Improving Diabetes by Reconstruction Methods in Gastric Cancer Patients With Diabetes Mellitus
NCT01375738 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Preliminary Efficacy Analysis of 'λ+α' Double-Tract Reconstruction After Laparoscopic Proximal Gastrectomy
NCT06475170 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
The Safety and Feasibility of Reduced Port Robotic Distal Gastrectomy Using Single-site for Surgical Treatment of Early Gastric Cancer
NCT02347956 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE1/PHASE2
-
A Prospective Study on Esophagogastrostomy by an Innovative Surgical Technique
NCT06300879 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Fatigue and QoL Among Gastric Cancer Patients Undergoing Abdominal Surgery
NCT03766945 ·Status: UNKNOWN
-
Multi-institutional Study on the Assessment of Robotic Surgery for Gastric Cancer
NCT01309256 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Gastrectomy Outcomes in Elderly Patients
NCT05071755 ·Status: UNKNOWN
-
Anastomotic Leak Testing in Gastrectomy
NCT04292496 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
The Efficacy and Safety of Laparoscopic Proximal Gastrectomy With LPG-tbROSF Versus LTG for Localized Proximal Gastric Cancer.
NCT07260461 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Randomized Controlled Trials on Clinical Outcomes of Totally Laparoscopic Versus Laparoscopy Assisted Total Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer
NCT03006263 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Short-term Outcomes of SILS+1 Versus CLS for Distal Gastric Cancer
NCT05035446 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE3
-
Laparoscopy-Assisted Surgery for Carcinoma of the Low Rectum
NCT01899547 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Totally Laparoscopic Distal Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer
NCT05556980 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Quality of Life After Cytoreductive Surgery and Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy
NCT03503071 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING
-
Robotic and Laparoscopic Total Gastrectomy With D2 Lymphadenectomy for Locally Advanced Gastric Cancer
NCT03500471 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Comparison of Laparoscopic Versus Open Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer: A Prospective Randomized Trial
NCT00452751 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE3
-
Cohort Study Comparing Surgeon Stress, Utilization of Surgical Instruments, Surgical Outcomes According to Surgical Approach for Gastrectomy
NCT04972149 ·Status: UNKNOWN
-
Comparison of Open Laparoscopic and Robotic Surgery in Gastric Cancer Resection.
NCT03447106 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Oncological Differences Between Transanal and Laparoscopic Total Mesorectal Excision for Rectal Cancer.
NCT05201885 ·Status: RECRUITING
-
Bacteriological Differences Between Transanal and Laparoscopic Total Mesorectal Excision for Rectal Cancer.
NCT05201872 ·Status: UNKNOWN
-
Impact of Quality of Life in the Patients With Sleep Disturbance From Low Anterior Resection Syndrome in Advanced Rectal Cancer Patients
NCT06271629 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Impact of the Type of Reconstruction Methods on Diabetes Following Laparoscopic Distal Gastrectomy in Patients With Gastric Cancer and Type 2 Diabetes
NCT04539769 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE2
-
Comparison of Surgical,Clinical and Oncological Outcomes Between Robotic-assisted and Laparoscopic-assisted Gastrectomy
NCT02413476 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE2/PHASE3